Literature DB >> 15716008

Organization and base composition of tilapia Hox genes: implications for the evolution of Hox clusters in fish.

Simona Santini1, Giorgio Bernardi.   

Abstract

Hox genes encode DNA binding proteins that specify cell fate in the anterior-posterior axis of metazoan animal embryos. While each Hox cluster contains the same genes among the different mammalian species, this does not happen in ray-finned fish, in which both the number and organization of Hox genes and even Hox clusters are variables. Ray-finned fish are believed to have undergone an additional genome duplication that led to the presence of 8 Hox clusters (four twin pairs) in their ancestor. Here we describe the Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) Hox genes set in terms of gene content, clusters organization and base composition and compare it with those of pufferfish and zebrafish. We observed that in all these fish, when paralogous genes are conserved in both the twin clusters, the gene which has a lower GC level generally: (i) belongs to the less gene-rich (less conserved) cluster; (ii) has a reduced field of embryonic expression; or (iii) is a pseudogene. The relationship between the decrease of GC level and the loss of conservation and function of one of the paralogous genes from twin clusters is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15716008     DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2004.10.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gene        ISSN: 0378-1119            Impact factor:   3.688


  13 in total

1.  Tol2-mediated transgenesis in tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus).

Authors:  Koji Fujimura; Thomas D Kocher
Journal:  Aquaculture       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 4.242

2.  The neoselectionist theory of genome evolution.

Authors:  Giorgio Bernardi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Phylogenetic relationships and the evolution of regulatory gene sequences in the parrotfishes.

Authors:  Lydia L Smith; Jennifer L Fessler; Michael E Alfaro; J Todd Streelman; Mark W Westneat
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 4.286

4.  The Genomic Substrate for Adaptive Radiation: Copy Number Variation across 12 Tribes of African Cichlid Species.

Authors:  Joshua J Faber-Hammond; Etienne Bezault; David H Lunt; Domino A Joyce; Suzy C P Renn
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 3.416

5.  An isochore map of human chromosomes.

Authors:  Maria Costantini; Oliver Clay; Fabio Auletta; Giorgio Bernardi
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Comparative analysis of Hox paralog group 2 gene expression during Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) embryonic development.

Authors:  Pierre Le Pabic; Edmund J Stellwag; Shelby N Brothers; Jean-Luc Scemama
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2007-10-09       Impact factor: 0.900

7.  Hox cluster duplication in the basal teleost Hiodon alosoides (Osteoglossomorpha).

Authors:  Karen E Chambers; Ryan McDaniell; Jeremy D Raincrow; Maya Deshmukh; Peter F Stadler; Chi-hua Chiu
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 1.919

8.  Circular DNA intermediate in the duplication of Nile tilapia vasa genes.

Authors:  Koji Fujimura; Matthew A Conte; Thomas D Kocher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Comparative phylogenomic analyses of teleost fish Hox gene clusters: lessons from the cichlid fish Astatotilapia burtoni.

Authors:  Simone Hoegg; Jeffrey L Boore; Jennifer V Kuehl; Axel Meyer
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2007-09-10       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 10.  Evolution of Hox gene clusters in deuterostomes.

Authors:  Juan Pascual-Anaya; Salvatore D'Aniello; Shigeru Kuratani; Jordi Garcia-Fernàndez
Journal:  BMC Dev Biol       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 1.978

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.