Literature DB >> 15715978

A SCA7 CAG/CTG repeat expansion is stable in Drosophila melanogaster despite modulation of genomic context and gene dosage.

Stephen M Jackson1, Alex J Whitworth, Jessica C Greene, Randell T Libby, Sandy L Baccam, Leo J Pallanck, Albert R La Spada.   

Abstract

CAG and CTG repeat expansions are the cause of at least a dozen inherited neurological disorders. In these so-called "dynamic mutation" diseases, the expanded repeats display dramatic genetic instability, changing in size when transmitted through the germline and within somatic tissues. As the molecular basis of the repeat instability process remains poorly understood, modeling of repeat instability in model organisms has provided some insights into potentially involved factors, implicating especially replication and repair pathways. Studies in mice have also shown that the genomic context of the repeat sequence is required for CAG/CTG repeat instability in the case of spinocerebellar ataxia type 7 (SCA7), one of the most unstable of all CAG/CTG repeat disease loci. While most studies of repeat instability have taken a candidate gene approach, unbiased screens for factors involved in trinucleotide repeat instability have been lacking. We therefore attempted to use Drosophila melanogaster to model expanded CAG repeat instability by creating transgenic flies carrying trinucleotide repeat expansions, deriving flies with SCA7 CAG90 repeats in cDNA and genomic context. We found that SCA7 CAG90 repeats are stable in Drosophila, regardless of context. To screen for genes whose reduced function might destabilize expanded CAG repeat tracts in Drosophila, we crossed the SCA7 CAG90 repeat flies with various deficiency stocks, including lines lacking genes encoding the orthologues of flap endonuclease-1, PCNA, and MutS. In all cases, perfect repeat stability was preserved, suggesting that Drosophila may not be a suitable system for determining the molecular basis of SCA7 CAG repeat instability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15715978     DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2004.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gene        ISSN: 0378-1119            Impact factor:   3.688


  7 in total

Review 1.  DNA base excision repair: a mechanism of trinucleotide repeat expansion.

Authors:  Yuan Liu; Samuel H Wilson
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 13.807

2.  Absence of MutSβ leads to the formation of slipped-DNA for CTG/CAG contractions at primate replication forks.

Authors:  Meghan M Slean; Gagan B Panigrahi; Arturo López Castel; August B Pearson; Alan E Tomkinson; Christopher E Pearson
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2016-04-16

3.  Consensus Paper: Strengths and Weaknesses of Animal Models of Spinocerebellar Ataxias and Their Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Jan Cendelin; Marija Cvetanovic; Mandi Gandelman; Hirokazu Hirai; Harry T Orr; Stefan M Pulst; Michael Strupp; Filip Tichanek; Jan Tuma; Mario Manto
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 3.648

4.  Replication-dependent instability at (CTG) x (CAG) repeat hairpins in human cells.

Authors:  Guoqi Liu; Xiaomi Chen; John J Bissler; Richard R Sinden; Michael Leffak
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 15.040

Review 5.  Drosophila as an In Vivo Model for Human Neurodegenerative Disease.

Authors:  Leeanne McGurk; Amit Berson; Nancy M Bonini
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Full-length human mutant huntingtin with a stable polyglutamine repeat can elicit progressive and selective neuropathogenesis in BACHD mice.

Authors:  Michelle Gray; Dyna I Shirasaki; Carlos Cepeda; Véronique M André; Brian Wilburn; Xiao-Hong Lu; Jifang Tao; Irene Yamazaki; Shi-Hua Li; Yi E Sun; Xiao-Jiang Li; Michael S Levine; X William Yang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Drosophila melanogaster As a Model Organism to Study RNA Toxicity of Repeat Expansion-Associated Neurodegenerative and Neuromuscular Diseases.

Authors:  Alex C Koon; Ho Yin Edwin Chan
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 5.505

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.