Literature DB >> 15715617

Change in anaesthetic practice for Caesarean section in Germany.

U M Stamer1, R Wiese, F Stüber, H Wulf, T Meuser.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Initial data from 1996 revealed that in contrast to several other countries general anaesthesia was the preferred anaesthetic technique for Caesarean section in Germany. However, anaesthetic practice for Caesarean section has changed during the last decades world-wide. This investigation was performed to obtain more actual data on anaesthetic procedures in obstetric patients in German hospitals.
METHODS: Questionnaires on the practice of anaesthesia for Caesarean section were mailed to 918 German departments of anaesthesiology. Furthermore, the survey evaluated severe perioperative complications in obstetric patients.
RESULTS: The 397 completed replies in this survey represent 41.3% of all German deliveries in 2002. Spinal anaesthesia is now the most common technique (50.5%) for elective Caesarean section. In case of urgent and emergency Caesarean, delivery figures decrease to 34.6% and 4.8%, respectively. Epidural anaesthesia is performed in 21.6% of scheduled and 13.2% and 1.0% of non-scheduled urgent or emergency Caesarean sections, respectively. Four maternal deaths and several non-fatal episodes of gastric content aspiration were reported by the respondents.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared to data obtained 6 years ago a significant increase in regional anaesthesia for Caesarean section has developed, with spinal anaesthesia being the preferred technique. Surveys can help to initiate discussion and improve current practice of anaesthetic care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15715617     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2004.00583.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-5172            Impact factor:   2.105


  14 in total

1.  [Obstetric epidural analgesia : quantity and quality].

Authors:  U Stamer
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.107

2.  [Modified rapid sequence induction for Caesarian sections : case series on the use of rocuronium and sugammadex].

Authors:  D Nauheimer; C Kollath; G Geldner
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 3.  [Anesthesiological management of Caesarean sections : nationwide survey in Germany].

Authors:  H E Marcus; A Behrend; R Schier; O Dagtekin; P Teschendorf; B W Böttiger; F Spöhr
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Blood loss in elective cesarean section: is there a difference related to the type of anesthesia? A randomized prospective study.

Authors:  Hüseyin Aksoy; Ülkü Aksoy; Burak Yücel; Sezin Saygı Özyurt; Gökhan Açmaz; Mustafa Alparslan Babayiğit; Günhan Gökahmetoğlu; Turgut Aydın
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2015-07-14

5.  [Management of cardiac high risk pregnancy. Caesarean section in a primagravida with cyanotic cardiac defect].

Authors:  S Kramer; T Schröder; M Schuster; V Stangl; I Correns; W Sanad; T Volk
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  [Peripartum cardiomyopathy: interdisciplinary challenge].

Authors:  B Löser; S Tank; G Hillebrand; B Goldmann; W Diehl; D Biermann; J Schirmer; D A Reuter
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.041

7.  Use of local anaesthetics and adjuncts for spinal and epidural anaesthesia and analgesia at German and Austrian University Hospitals: an online survey to assess current standard practice.

Authors:  Bianca M Wahlen; Norbert Roewer; Peter Kranke
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2010-04-17       Impact factor: 2.217

8.  A survey of perioperative and postoperative anesthetic practices for cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Leinani Aiono-Le Tagaloa; Alexander J Butwick; Brendan Carvalho
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2010-02-24

9.  Hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: identification of risk factors using an anesthesia information management system.

Authors:  F Brenck; B Hartmann; C Katzer; R Obaid; D Brüggmann; M Benson; R Röhrig; A Junger
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 2.502

10.  [A survey of labour pain management in Germany].

Authors:  T Meuser; R Wiese; D Molitor; S Grond; U M Stamer
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.107

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.