Literature DB >> 15714900

Gaze direction modulates auditory spatial deficits in stroke patients with neglect.

Francesco Pavani1, Elisabetta Làdavas, Jon Driver.   

Abstract

We investigated the effects of eye position on auditory spatial deficits in four patients with left neglect and right-hemisphere damage, using three blocked gaze directions (35 degrees to the right, central, or 35 degrees to the left), while preventing any head-movement to ensure that initial auditory inputs remained constant regardless of eye-in-orbit position. The auditory task required speeded discrimination of sound elevation, with patients moving a central lever up or down according to the vertical position of a peripheral target sound, regardless of its side (left or right). Replicating previous auditory research, the patients' vertical discrimination performance was worse for auditory targets on the contralesional (left) versus the ipsilesional side, indicating neglect-related auditory deficits on this task. Critically, while this worse performance for left than right auditory targets was present (for both reaction times and errors) when gaze was directed centrally or rightwards, it was considerably reduced when gaze was directed leftwards. These results demonstrate that lateral gaze-direction can modulate neglect-related auditory spatial deficits, even though eye-position did not alter the initial auditory inputs. This outcome may relate to audio-visual links in spatial orienting and potentially some retinocentric influences on perceived sound location, although the latter alone could not explain all our results. Such findings might involve multisensory brain structures in which responses to sounds are modulated by eye-in-orbit position.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15714900     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70892-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  8 in total

1.  Distortions of auditory space during rapid head turns.

Authors:  Joel Cooper; Simon Carlile; David Alais
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Decreased visual attention further from the perceived direction of gaze for equidistant retinal targets.

Authors:  Daniela Balslev; Emma Gowen; R Chris Miall
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Extraocular muscle afferent signals modulate visual attention.

Authors:  Daniela Balslev; William Newman; Paul C Knox
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Intention and attention: different functional roles for LIPd and LIPv.

Authors:  Yuqing Liu; Eric A Yttri; Lawrence H Snyder
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-28       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Eye position representation in human anterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  Daniela Balslev; R Chris Miall
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Spatial Neglect Subtypes, Definitions and Assessment Tools: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Lindy J Williams; Jocelyn Kernot; Susan L Hillier; Tobias Loetscher
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  Auditory selective attention reveals preparatory activity in different cortical regions for selection based on source location and source pitch.

Authors:  Adrian K C Lee; Siddharth Rajaram; Jing Xia; Hari Bharadwaj; Eric Larson; Matti S Hämäläinen; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Velocity Selective Networks in Human Cortex Reveal Two Functionally Distinct Auditory Motion Systems.

Authors:  Jhao-An Meng; Kourosh Saberi; I-Hui Hsieh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.