Literature DB >> 15714353

Surgical correction of metopic synostosis.

Henry E Aryan1, Rahul Jandial, Burak M Ozgur, Samuel A Hughes, Hal S Meltzer, Min S Park, Michael L Levy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Premature closure of the metopic suture results in deformation of the anterior portion of the calvarium, which can vary from mild to severe. In mild forms, there is only prominent ridging of the metopic suture; more severe forms result in a marked narrowing of the frontal and temporal regions that in turn affects the supraorbital rims and produces hypotelorism.
METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed 39 consecutive cases of metopic synostosis treated over a 12-year period.
RESULTS: The average age at referral was 5 months, with surgery performed at an average age of 7.5 months. Fifteen infants had other congenital anomalies, with eight having synostosis of other sutures. Follow-up ranged from 7 months to 6 years, with an average of 29 months. In three mild cases, burring of the metopic ridge was performed with excellent aesthetic results in all cases. The other 36 patients had significant deformity of the supraorbital ridges and temporal regions, with obvious hypotelorism for over 50% of the time. In these cases, the patients underwent craniofacial reconstruction to normalize their appearance. In addition, the lateral aspect of the sphenoid ridges, including the orbital roof and lateral orbital wall to the infraorbital fissure, was removed to free the cranial base. The average blood loss was under 400 ml and the average hospital stay was 3.6 days. Results were considered good to excellent in all except three cases, which had recurrence of a prominent metopic ridge; two required a second operation after 6 months for burring of this ridge, whereas the third was treated conservatively with an orthotic headband.
CONCLUSION: Mild forms of metopic synostosis can be successfully treated with burring of the metopic ridge alone. Severe forms require craniofacial reconstruction and may be associated with other congenital abnormalities, additional synostosis, and developmental delay. In all cases, the operative procedure must be tailored to the nature and severity of the deformity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15714353     DOI: 10.1007/s00381-004-1108-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst        ISSN: 0256-7040            Impact factor:   1.475


  37 in total

Review 1.  Consensus: trigonocephaly.

Authors:  H Collmann; N Sörensen; J Krauss
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Craniosynostosis: a review of 519 surgical patients.

Authors:  J Shillito; D D Matson
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1968-04       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Impairment in the epidemiological measurement of childhood psychopathology in the community.

Authors:  H R Bird; T J Yager; B Staghezza; M S Gould; G Canino; M Rubio-Stipec
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 8.829

4.  Surgical treatment of trigonocephaly. Experience with 30 cases.

Authors:  P Dhellemmes; P Pellerin; J P Lejeune; F Lepoutre
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  Surgical approaches for the correction of metopic synostosis.

Authors:  J B Delashaw; J A Persing; T S Park; J A Jane
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Predicting the risk of reoperation in metopic synostosis: a quantitative CT scan analysis.

Authors:  Keith T Paige; Steven R Cohen; Catherine Simms; Fernando D Burstein; Roger Hudgins; William Boydston
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.539

7.  Radical forehead remodeling for craniostenosis.

Authors:  D Marchac
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Trigonocephaly (metopic synostosis). Clinical, surgical and anatomical concepts.

Authors:  S Oi; S Matsumoto
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.475

9.  Longitudinal assessment of mental development in infants with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis with and without cranial release and reconstruction.

Authors:  K A Kapp-Simon; A Figueroa; C A Jocher; M Schafer
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Trigonocephaly-associated hypotelorism: is treatment necessary?

Authors:  J A Fearon; J C Kolar; I R Munro
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.730

View more
  18 in total

1.  Guideline for Care of Patients With the Diagnoses of Craniosynostosis: Working Group on Craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Irene M J Mathijssen
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.046

2.  Personalized Optimal Planning for the Surgical Correction of Metopic Craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Antonio R Porras; D Zukic; A Equobahrie; Gary F Rogers; Marius George Linguraru
Journal:  Clin Image Based Proced       Date:  2016-09-21

3.  3D visualization and simulation of frontoorbital advancement in metopic synostosis.

Authors:  Thomas Rodt; Arkadius Schlesinger; Alexander Schramm; Marc Diensthuber; Marion Rittierodt; Joachim K Krauss
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Small anatomical variant has profound implications for evolution of human birth and brain development.

Authors:  Robert G Tague
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Developmental constraints on behavioural flexibility.

Authors:  Kay E Holekamp; Eli M Swanson; Page E Van Meter
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Neurodevelopmental and esthetic results in children after surgical correction of metopic suture synostosis: a single institutional experience.

Authors:  Mathias Kunz; Markus Lehner; Alfred Heger; Lena Armbruster; Heike Weigand; Gerson Mast; Aurelia Peraud
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 1.475

7.  Assessing aesthetic outcomes after trigonocephaly correction.

Authors:  Philipp Metzler; Wolfgang Zemann; Christine Jacobsen; Heinz-Theo Lübbers; Klaus Wilhelm Grätz; Joachim Anton Obwegeser
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-02-17

8.  Surgical Management and Evaluation of the Craniofacial Growth and Morphology in Cleidocranial Dysplasia.

Authors:  Stephen L Greene; Chung How Kau; Somsak Sittitavornwong; Kathlyn Powell; Noel K Childers; Mary MacDougall; Ejvis Lamani
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.046

9.  The shell technique: bilateral fronto-orbital reshaping in trigonocephaly.

Authors:  Concezio Di Rocco; Paolo Frassanito; Gianpiero Tamburrini
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 1.475

10.  New severity indices for quantifying single-suture metopic craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Salvador Ruiz-Correa; Jacqueline R Starr; H Jill Lin; Kathleen A Kapp-Simon; Raymond W Sze; Richard G Ellenbogen; Matthew L Speltz; Michael L Cunningham
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.654

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.