Literature DB >> 15714010

Diagnostic stability in depressive disorder as according to ICD-10 in clinical practice.

Lars Vedel Kessing1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The diagnostic stability of the ICD-10 diagnosis of depressive disorder has not been investigated in clinical practice. SAMPLING AND METHODS: All patients who were diagnosed with depressive disorder at least once in a period from 1994 to 2002 in psychiatric out- or inpatient settings in Denmark were identified in a nationwide register.
RESULTS: A total of 39,741 patients were diagnosed with depressive disorder at least once; among these, 81% were diagnosed at the first contact. In approximately 56% of patients, the initial diagnosis of depressive disorder eventually changed during follow-up mainly to the schizophrenic spectrum (16%), but also to personality disorders (9%), neurotic, stress-related and somatoform disorders (8%) and to bipolar disorder (8%). Among the 18% of patients who were later diagnosed with depressive disorder, 23% initially had a diagnosis of adjustment disorder.
CONCLUSIONS: When the ICD-10 diagnoses are used in clinical practice, the diagnosis of depressive disorder has a low stability over time. These findings emphasize the need for a longitudinally based diagnostic process in the diagnostic systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15714010     DOI: 10.1159/000083968

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopathology        ISSN: 0254-4962            Impact factor:   1.944


  8 in total

1.  McLean-Harvard International First-Episode Project: two-year stability of ICD-10 diagnoses in 500 first-episode psychotic disorder patients.

Authors:  Paola Salvatore; Ross J Baldessarini; Mauricio Tohen; Hari-Mandir K Khalsa; Jesus Perez Sanchez-Toledo; Carlos A Zarate; Eduard Vieta; Carlo Maggini
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 4.384

2.  The Diagnostic Stability of DSM-IV Diagnoses: An Examination of Major Depressive Disorder, Bipolar I Disorder, and Schizophrenia in Korean Patients.

Authors:  Won Kim; Young Sup Woo; Jeong-Ho Chae; Won-Myong Bahk
Journal:  Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-31       Impact factor: 2.582

3.  Diagnostic shifts during the decade following first admission for psychosis.

Authors:  Evelyn J Bromet; Roman Kotov; Laura J Fochtmann; Gabrielle A Carlson; Marsha Tanenberg-Karant; Camilo Ruggero; Su-wei Chang
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 18.112

4.  Parental history of psychiatric diagnoses and unipolar depression: a Danish National Register-based cohort study.

Authors:  K L Musliner; B B Trabjerg; B L Waltoft; T M Laursen; P B Mortensen; P P Zandi; T Munk-Olsen
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 7.723

5.  A 4-year follow-up study of syndromal and sub-syndromal anxiety and depression symptoms in the general population: the HUNT study.

Authors:  Ottar Bjerkeset; Hans M Nordahl; Sara Larsson; Alv A Dahl; Olav Linaker
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2007-12-06       Impact factor: 4.328

6.  Youth at-risk for serious mental illness: methods of the PROCAN study.

Authors:  Jean Addington; Benjamin I Goldstein; Jian Li Wang; Sidney H Kennedy; Signe Bray; Catherine Lebel; Stefanie Hassel; Catherine Marshall; Glenda MacQueen
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 3.630

7.  Psychopathology and functional impairment among patients attending an adolescent health clinic: Implications for healthcare model reform.

Authors:  Sushila Russell; Balakrishnan Subramanian; Paul Swamidhas Sudhakar Russell
Journal:  Osteopath Med Prim Care       Date:  2008-02-08

8.  The psychometric properties of Beck Depression Inventory for adolescent depression in a primary-care paediatric setting in India.

Authors:  Mona Basker; Prabhakar D Moses; Sushila Russell; Paul Swamidhas Sudhakar Russell
Journal:  Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health       Date:  2007-08-09       Impact factor: 3.033

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.