Literature DB >> 15713549

Assessing the potential of fish cell lines as tools for the cytotoxicity testing of estuarine sediment aqueous elutriates.

M Davoren1, S Ní Shúilleabháin, M G J Hartl, D Sheehan, N M O'Brien, J O'Halloran, F N A M Van Pelt, C Mothersill.   

Abstract

In the present study, we assess the potential of fish cell lines (CHSE, EPC and RTG-2) to be used as screening tools for the ecotoxicological assessment of estuarine sediments. The processing of sediment to a form suitable for in vitro exposure is an inherent problem when using cell cultures. The approach employed in this study was to prepare aqueous elutriate extracts from whole sediments, which were subsequently used to reconstitute powdered media. This procedure allowed the exposure of cell cultures to concentrations of up to and including 100% of the original aqueous sample. Cytotoxicity was assessed using multiple endpoint measurements. Cell viability was quantified using the neutral red and alamar blue colorimetric assays, which specifically assess lysosomal and mitochondrial function, respectively. In addition, the total protein content of the cells was measured using the coomassie blue assay. Initial tests were conducted to ensure that any resultant cytotoxicity was due to sample contaminants and not osmotic stress. In addition, elutriate samples were spiked with a model toxicant to verify the ability of the cell lines to detect and respond to bioavailable contaminants. Chemical analyses were conducted on sediments from all sampling sites to assist in interpreting any observed cytotoxicity. A differential response was observed for the cytotoxicity assays following exposure treatments, which emphasises the importance of employing multiple endpoints for the determination of toxicity. Of the three cell lines utilised in this study, RTG-2 cells were the most suitable for the testing of estuarine aqueous elutriate samples on the basis of tolerance to osmolality effects. Slight toxicity was observed following exposure to the aqueous elutriates tested in this study using RTG-2 cells and the alamar blue assay. In order to fully evaluate the overall sensitivity of this cell line, further research is warranted using an extensive range of test sites incorporating more polluted sediments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15713549     DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2004.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro        ISSN: 0887-2333            Impact factor:   3.500


  5 in total

1.  Establishment and characterization of a continuous cell line from thymus of striped snakehead, Channa striatus (Bloch 1793).

Authors:  Neeraj Sood; D K Chaudhary; P K Pradhan; D K Verma; T Raja Swaminathan; B Kushwaha; P Punia; J K Jena
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 2.416

2.  Effect of solid lipid nanoparticles formulation compositions on their size, zeta potential and potential for in vitro pHIS-HIV-hugag transfection.

Authors:  Rathapon Asasutjarit; Sven-Iver Lorenzen; Sunee Sirivichayakul; Kiat Ruxrungtham; Uracha Ruktanonchai; Garnpimol C Ritthidej
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2007-03-24       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  A test battery approach to the ecotoxicological evaluation of cadmium and copper employing a battery of marine bioassays.

Authors:  Ailbhe Macken; Michelle Giltrap; Kim Ryall; Barry Foley; Evin McGovern; Brendan McHugh; Maria Davoren
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 4.  Multiple applications of Alamar Blue as an indicator of metabolic function and cellular health in cell viability bioassays.

Authors:  Sephra N Rampersad
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Lagos lagoon sediment organic extracts and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons induce embryotoxic, teratogenic and genotoxic effects in Danio rerio (zebrafish) embryos.

Authors:  Temitope O Sogbanmu; Eszter Nagy; David H Phillips; Volker M Arlt; Adebayo A Otitoloju; Nic R Bury
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 4.223

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.