Literature DB >> 15711863

External pelvic rectal suspension (the Express procedure) for full-thickness rectal prolapse: evolution of a new technique.

N S Williams1, P Giordano, L S Dvorkin, A Huang, F H Hetzer, S M Scott.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Délorme's operation for rectal prolapse is a safe procedure but has a high recurrence rate. We aimed to develop an operation akin to it, but designed to reduce this deficit. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one consecutive patients with rectal prolapse were included in the study. Initially, a conventional Délorme's procedure was performed and sutures or strips of Gore-Tex were attached circumferentially to the apex of the prolapse, tunneled subcutaneously, and anchored to the external surface of the pelvis. Subsequently, the procedure was modified. Acellular porcine collagen strips were used and buried within the apex without plication of the denuded rectal musculature. Patients were formally assessed preoperatively and four months postoperatively by symptom and quality of life questionnaires and subsequently by regular clinical review.
RESULTS: In the Gore-Tex group (N = 11; males:females = 10:1; mean age, 61 years) three patients underwent suture repair and eight had strip fixation. All suture repairs developed sepsis and one patient had a recurrence. Seven of the strip fixations (88 percent) developed sepsis that resulted in implant extrusion. There was one full-thickness and one mucosal recurrence after a median follow-up of 25 months. In the collagen group (N = 20; males:females = 2:18; mean age, 63 years), sepsis occurred in four patients, requiring surgical intervention in one patient (5 percent) (cf Gore-Tex group, P = 0.002). There was one mucosal and three full-thickness (15 percent) recurrences after a median follow-up of 14 months (cf Gore-Tex group, P = not significant). Significant improvements in symptom and quality of life scores were recorded in both groups at four months.
CONCLUSION: A new, minimally invasive perineal procedure for rectal prolapse has been developed and initial data testify to its relative safety provided collagen is used. It remains to be seen whether long-term recurrence rates will be lower than those of conventional perineal procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15711863     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-0806-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  6 in total

1.  Perineal approaches to rectal prolapse.

Authors:  Mari A Madsen
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-05

2.  Perineal sigmoidopexy utilizing transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) to treat full thickness rectal prolapse: a feasibility trial in porcine and human cadaver models.

Authors:  Liliana Bordeianou; Patricia Sylla; Christine V Kinnier; David Rattner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Robotic sacrocolpoperineopexy with ventral rectopexy for the combined treatment of rectal and pelvic organ prolapse: initial report and technique.

Authors:  Jhansi Reddy; Beri Ridgeway; Brooke Gurland; Marie Fidela R Paraiso
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-03-05

4.  Transvaginal sacrospinous rectopexy: initial clinical experience.

Authors:  B Gurland; K A Garrett; F Firoozi; H B Goldman
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Delorme's Procedure for Complete Rectal Prolapse: A Study of Recurrence Patterns in the Long Term.

Authors:  Carlos Placer; Jose M Enriquez-Navascués; Ander Timoteo; Garazi Elorza; Nerea Borda; Lander Gallego; Yolanda Saralegui
Journal:  Surg Res Pract       Date:  2015-12-10

Review 6.  Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse.

Authors:  Nasra N Alam; Sunil K Narang; Ferdinand Köckerling; Ian R Daniels; Neil J Smart
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2015-10-19
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.