Literature DB >> 15711830

Kinetochore rearrangement in meiosis II requires attachment to the spindle.

Leocadia V Paliulis1, R Bruce Nicklas.   

Abstract

The distinctive behaviors of chromosomes in mitosis and meiosis depend upon differences in kinetochore position. Kinetochore position is well established except for a critical transition between meiosis I and meiosis II. We examined kinetochore position during the transition and compared it with the position of kinetochores in mitosis. Immunofluorescence staining using the 3F3/2 antibody showed that in mitosis in grasshopper cells, as in other organisms, kinetochores are positioned on opposite sides of the two sister chromatids. In meiosis I, sister kinetochores are positioned side by side. At nuclear envelope breakdown in meiosis II, sister kinetochores are still side by side, but are separated by the time all chromosomes have fully attached in metaphase II. Micromanipulation experiments reveal that this switch from side-by-side to separated sister kinetochores requires attachment to the spindle. Moreover, it is irreversible, as chromosomes detached from a metaphase II spindle retain separate kinetochores. How this critical separation of sister kinetochores occurs in meiosis is uncertain, but clearly it is not built into the chromosome before nuclear envelope breakdown, as it is in mitosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15711830     DOI: 10.1007/s00412-005-0330-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosoma        ISSN: 0009-5915            Impact factor:   4.316


  25 in total

1.  Ultrastructure of the prophase kinetochore in cultured cells of rat-kangaroo (Potorous tridactylis).

Authors:  W K Heneen
Journal:  Hereditas       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 3.271

2.  Polo-like kinase Cdc5 promotes chiasmata formation and cosegregation of sister centromeres at meiosis I.

Authors:  Rosemary K Clyne; Vittorio L Katis; Lea Jessop; Kirsten R Benjamin; Ira Herskowitz; Michael Lichten; Kim Nasmyth
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 28.824

3.  Two fission yeast homologs of Drosophila Mei-S332 are required for chromosome segregation during meiosis I and II.

Authors:  Kirsten P Rabitsch; Juraj Gregan; Alex Schleiffer; Jean-Paul Javerzat; Frank Eisenhaber; Kim Nasmyth
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-02-17       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 4.  Chromosome segregation during meiosis: building an unambivalent bivalent.

Authors:  D P Moore; T L Orr-Weaver
Journal:  Curr Top Dev Biol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 5.  The molecular basis of sister-chromatid cohesion.

Authors:  J Y Lee; T L Orr-Weaver
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 13.827

6.  The telochore: a telomeric differentiation of the chromosome axis.

Authors:  J A Suja; J S Rufas
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 5.239

7.  Microtubules, chromosome movement, and reorientation after chromosomes are detached from the spindle by micromanipulation.

Authors:  R B Nicklas; D F Kubai
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.316

8.  Role of Polo-like kinase CDC5 in programming meiosis I chromosome segregation.

Authors:  Brian H Lee; Angelika Amon
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-03-27       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  The reduction of chromosome number in meiosis is determined by properties built into the chromosomes.

Authors:  L V Paliulis; R B Nicklas
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2000-09-18       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Spindle microtubules and their mechanical associations after micromanipulation in anaphase.

Authors:  R B Nicklas; D F Kubai; T S Hays
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Holocentric chromosomes: convergent evolution, meiotic adaptations, and genomic analysis.

Authors:  Daniël P Melters; Leocadia V Paliulis; Ian F Korf; Simon W L Chan
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  The centenary of Janssens's chiasmatype theory.

Authors:  Romain Koszul; Matthew Meselson; Karine Van Doninck; Jean Vandenhaute; Denise Zickler
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Micromechanics of human mitotic chromosomes.

Authors:  Mingxuan Sun; Ryo Kawamura; John F Marko
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Dynamics and control of sister kinetochore behavior during the meiotic divisions in Drosophila spermatocytes.

Authors:  Soumya Chaurasia; Christian F Lehner
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 5.917

5.  Sister centromere fusion during meiosis I depends on maintaining cohesins and destabilizing microtubule attachments.

Authors:  Lin-Ing Wang; Arunika Das; Kim S McKim
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 5.917

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.