Literature DB >> 15711722

Staging in childhood lymphoma: differences between FDG-PET and CT.

S Hermann1, D Wormanns, M Pixberg, A Hunold, W Heindel, H Jürgens, O Schober, C Franzius.   

Abstract

AIM: The clinical value of positron emission tomography using fluorine-18 fluoro-deoxy-glucose (FDG-PET) in the staging of adult lymphoma has been shown in many studies. However, there are only few data regarding childhood lymphoma. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the staging of childhood lymphoma using FDG-PET and the established computed tomography (CT).
METHOD: Whole-body FDG-PET was performed in 25 children with histologically proven Hodgkin's disease (n = 18) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 7) using a dedicated PET. The findings were compared with the CT results. Both examinations, FDG-PET and CT, were assessed by two experienced physicians. In each patient, 30 regions were analysed (22 nodal, 8 extranodal). Each region was assessed using a five value scale (definitely/probably positive, equivocal, probably/definitely negative).
RESULTS: 662 regions (470 nodal, 192 extranodal) were compared. 91 regions (81 nodal, 10 extranodal; 14%) were concordant positive and 517 regions (347 nodal, 170 extranodal; 78%) were concordant negative. In 47 regions, 48 discordant findings (7%) were described: 27 findings (22 nodal, 5 extranodal) were positive using FDG-PET and negative using CT whereas 21 findings (17 nodal, 4 extranodal) were positive using CT and negative using PET. A total of 7 regions (1%) were judged equivocal in one imaging modality (1 FDG-PET, 6 CT). Using FDG-PET as compared to CT, resulted in a higher staging in 4 of 25 patients and in a lower staging in 2 of 25 patients.
CONCLUSION: Staging of childhood lymphoma using FDGPET shows differences compared with CT resulting in a different staging in 6 of 25 patients. Prospective studies are required to evaluate the impact of these discrepancies on the clinical management of pediatric patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15711722     DOI: 10.1267/nukl05010001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nuklearmedizin        ISSN: 0029-5566            Impact factor:   1.379


  12 in total

1.  F-18 FDG-PET imaging and correlation with CT in staging and follow-up of pediatric lymphomas.

Authors:  Miguel Hernandez-Pampaloni; Amol Takalkar; Jian Q Yu; Hongming Zhuang; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-04-19

2.  18F-FDG PET/CT in paediatric lymphoma: comparison with conventional imaging.

Authors:  Kevin London; Siobhan Cross; Ella Onikul; Luciano Dalla-Pozza; Robert Howman-Giles
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Is PET/CT necessary in paediatric oncology? Against.

Authors:  K Hahn; T Pfluger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Is PET/CT necessary in paediatric oncology? For.

Authors:  Christiane Franzius; Kai Uwe Juergens; Otmar Schober
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 5.  PET/CT in paediatric oncology: indications and pitfalls.

Authors:  Christiane Franzius; Kai Uwe Juergens
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2009-06

Review 6.  FDG PET/CT in children and adolescents with lymphoma.

Authors:  Regine Kluge; Lars Kurch; Françoise Montravers; Christine Mauz-Körholz
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-03-24

7.  Comparison of 18F-FDG-PET and standard procedures for the pretreatment staging of children and adolescents with Hodgkin's disease.

Authors:  Edita Kabickova; David Sumerauer; Eliska Cumlivska; Eva Drahokoupilova; Michaela Nekolna; Marketa Chanova; Marie Hladikova; Roman Kodet; Otakar Belohlavek
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-03-25       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Value of PET/CT versus PET and CT performed as separate investigations in patients with Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  Christian la Fougère; Walter Hundt; Nicole Bröckel; Thomas Pfluger; Alexander Haug; Bernhard Scher; Marcus Hacker; Klaus Hahn; Maximilan Reiser; Reinhold Tiling
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-07-21       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Guidelines for 18F-FDG PET and PET-CT imaging in paediatric oncology.

Authors:  J Stauss; C Franzius; T Pfluger; K U Juergens; L Biassoni; J Begent; R Kluge; H Amthauer; T Voelker; L Højgaard; S Barrington; S Hain; T Lynch; K Hahn
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Role of PET/CT in malignant pediatric lymphoma.

Authors:  Raef Riad; Walid Omar; Magdy Kotb; Magdy Hafez; Iman Sidhom; Manal Zamzam; Iman Zaky; Hussein Abdel-Dayem
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.