Literature DB >> 15711632

Anxiety before, during, and after participation in a population-based screening mammography programme in Waikato Province, New Zealand.

Margaret Brunton1, Claire Jordan, Ian Campbell.   

Abstract

AIM: This study investigated anxiety levels before, during and after mammography in the Waikato breast cancer screening pilot.
METHOD: A sample of 1085 women on the Waikato database were sent survey questionnaires, which included questions about the anxiety experienced. Data from 584 completed questionnaires were obtained.
RESULTS: Two significant findings were identified. The first was that population-based screening can ultimately reduce anxiety for participants who receive a clear result from their mammogram. The second finding was that levels of worry throughout were related to ethnicity. Maori and Pacific Island women reported higher levels of worry than New Zealand European and Asian women about developing breast cancer (p<0.001), while awaiting their appointment (p=0.041) and results (p=0.046). Across all groups, levels of worry about developing breast cancer were also related to level of education (p=0.018), a family history of breast cancer (p=0.002), stress levels during screening mammography (p<0.001), and experience of pain during the procedure (p<0.001). At least some months following receipt of their results, 67% (95% CI 63-71) of all women experienced reassurance from receiving a clear result.
CONCLUSIONS: The results show that the population-based screening programme demonstrates greater potential to ultimately relieve (rather then increase) anxiety for participants who receive a clear result from their mammogram.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15711632

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Z Med J        ISSN: 0028-8446


  6 in total

1.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Breast Medical Tactile Examiners (MTEs): A Prospective Pilot Study.

Authors:  Michael P Lux; Julius Emons; Mayada R Bani; Marius Wunderle; Charlotte Sell; Caroline Preuss; Claudia Rauh; Sebastian M Jud; Felix Heindl; Hanna Langemann; Thomas Geyer; Anna-Lisa Brandl; Carolin C Hack; Werner Adler; Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland; Matthias W Beckmann; Peter A Fasching; Paul Gass
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Satisfaction, discomfort, obligations, and concerns in population-based breast cancer screening: cross-sectional study in a Danish population.

Authors:  Pernille Gabel; Mette Bach Larsen; Pernille Bjørnholt Nielsen; Dorte Brandt Svendstrup; Berit Andersen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Psychosocial impact of undergoing prostate cancer screening for men with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.

Authors:  Elizabeth K Bancroft; Sibel Saya; Elizabeth C Page; Kathryn Myhill; Sarah Thomas; Jennifer Pope; Anthony Chamberlain; Rachel Hart; Wayne Glover; Jackie Cook; Derek J Rosario; Brian T Helfand; Christina Hutten Selkirk; Rosemarie Davidson; Mark Longmuir; Diana M Eccles; Neus Gadea; Carole Brewer; Julian Barwell; Monica Salinas; Lynn Greenhalgh; Marc Tischkowitz; Alex Henderson; David Gareth Evans; Saundra S Buys; Rosalind A Eeles; Neil K Aaronson
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Patient-reported outcomes associated with cancer screening: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ashley Kim; Karen C Chung; Christopher Keir; Donald L Patrick
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  The role of effective communication to enhance participation in screening mammography: a New Zealand case.

Authors:  Margaret A Brunton
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 6.  Scanxiety: a scoping review about scan-associated anxiety.

Authors:  Kim Tam Bui; Roger Liang; Belinda E Kiely; Chris Brown; Haryana M Dhillon; Prunella Blinman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.