Literature DB >> 15711266

The effect of previous transperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy on transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Tibet Erdogru1, Dogu Teber, Thomas Frede, Reinaldo Marrero, Ahmed Hammady, Jens Rassweiler.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Previous laparoscopic herniorrhaphy has been considered a contraindication to laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). In this study we analyzed the impact of previous laparoscopic or open inguinal hernia repair on the outcome of transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using the Heilbronn technique.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In our database of 1,089 patients with LRP we identified 20 who underwent transperitoneal LRP and had a history of transperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy using prosthetic mesh (group 1). The outcome in that group was compared to that of 20 matched pair patients of a total of 95 in whom LRP was performed following open inguinal herniorrhaphy (group 2) and 20 matched pair patients of a total of 771 without previous surgery (group 3). Perioperative parameters (operative time, blood donation and complications) and postoperative results (duration and amount of analgesic treatment, catheterization and the continence rate) were analyzed.
RESULTS: According to the matched pair algorithm the 3 groups did not differ with respect to age (63.8, 66.2 and 63.0 years, p = 0.226), prostate volume (47.2, 43.3 and 47.7 gm, p = 0.501) or body mass index (26.1, 25.8 and 26.2 kg/m, respectively, p = 0.641). Ten pelvic lymphadenectomies and 8 nerve sparing (4 unilateral and 4 bilateral) procedures were performed per group. Ten and 12 patients in groups 1 and 2 had a history of bilateral herniorrhaphy, while previous unilateral herniorrhaphy was noted in the remaining 10 and 8, respectively. Mean operative time +/- SD (203.3 +/- 3.54, 196.7 +/- 43.7 and 214.7 +/- 37.7 minutes, p = 0.346) and mean catheterization time (8.1 +/- 2.8, 7.7 +/- 2.5 and 7.4 +/- 2.1 days, respectively, p = 0.684) did not differ significantly among the 3 groups. However, the mean amount of narcotic analgesic was significantly higher in group 1 compared with groups 2 and 3 (32.1 +/- 11.9, 21.8 +/- 11.9 and 19.5 +/- 10.1 mg, respectively, p = 0.002). Continence rates were similar in the groups at 88%, 87% and 92%, respectively, 1 year after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Previous laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy using prosthetic mesh does not adversively affect the operative outcomes or functional results of LRP, while the total amount of narcotic analgesics was significantly higher, reflecting increased postoperative morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15711266     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000152649.49630.06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  15 in total

1.  Long-term functional and oncological results after retroperitoneal laparoscopic prostatectomy according to a prospective evaluation of 550 patients.

Authors:  L Goeman; L Salomon; A La De Taille; D Vordos; A Hoznek; R Yiou; C C Abbou
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  [Laparoscopic pelvic surgery: Where do we stand in the year 2006?].

Authors:  J Rassweiler; D Teber; J de la Rosette; P Laguna; V Pansodoro; T Frede
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  Laparoscopic vs conventional tension free inguinal herniorrhaphy: 2005 society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) annual meeting debate.

Authors:  V Puri; E Felix; R J Fitzgibbons
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Safety of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy in patients with prior abdominopelvic or inguinal surgery.

Authors:  Mark W Ball; Adam C Reese; Lynda Z Mettee; Christian P Pavlovich
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 5.  Feasibility and outcomes regarding open and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in patients with previous synthetic mesh inguinal hernia repair: meta-analysis and systematic review of 7,497 patients.

Authors:  Stefano C M Picozzi; Cristian Ricci; Luigi Bonavina; Davide Bona; Robert Stubinski; Alberto Macchi; Dario Ratti; Elisabetta Finkelberg; Luca Carmignani
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Robotic or open radical prostatectomy after previous open surgery in the pelvic region.

Authors:  Mahmoud Mustafa; Curtis A Pettaway; John W Davis; Louis Pisters
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-02-05

7.  Extraperitoneal vs. transperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with a history of prior inguinal hernia repair with mesh.

Authors:  David Horovitz; Changyong Feng; Edward M Messing; Jean V Joseph
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-01-24

8.  Urological complications of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a case series.

Authors:  A Kocot; E W Gerharz; H Riedmiller
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2010-07-04       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy and previous surgical history: a multidisciplinary approach.

Authors:  Adrien N Bernstein; Hugh J Lavery; Adele R Hobbs; Edward Chin; David B Samadi
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2012-06-09

10.  Urologic pelvic surgery following mesh hernia repair.

Authors:  A Tsivian; O Brodsky; A Shtricker; M Tsivian; S Benjamin; A A Sidi
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 4.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.