PURPOSE: We investigated the effectiveness of a new method, intraprostatic administration of local anesthesia vs traditional periprostatic injection for decreasing the discomfort caused by transrectal ultrasound guided, 10 core biopsy of the prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 71 patients who received intraprostatic anesthesia between October 2002 and March 2003, and 99 who received periprostatic anesthesia between October 2001 and September 2002 before prostate biopsy. After biopsy patients were given a questionnaire, which consisted of 5 questions about pain and 3 about morbidity, and were asked to complete it and mail it to our department. RESULTS: The mean score +/- SD for the degree of pain during biopsy in the periprostatic groups was 2.6 +/- 1.1 and that in the intraprostatic group was 1.9 +/- 1.1, which was significantly different (p <0.001). Other items, including the degree of pain after biopsy, duration and location of pain, and medicine intake for pain, were not significantly different between the 2 groups. There was no significant difference in morbidity, including hematuria, hemospermia and rectal bleeding, between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Intraprostatic administration of local anesthesia significantly decreases the pain associated with prostate biopsy compared with periprostatic nerve block. It is a simple, safe and rapid technique that should be considered in all patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.
PURPOSE: We investigated the effectiveness of a new method, intraprostatic administration of local anesthesia vs traditional periprostatic injection for decreasing the discomfort caused by transrectal ultrasound guided, 10 core biopsy of the prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 71 patients who received intraprostatic anesthesia between October 2002 and March 2003, and 99 who received periprostatic anesthesia between October 2001 and September 2002 before prostate biopsy. After biopsy patients were given a questionnaire, which consisted of 5 questions about pain and 3 about morbidity, and were asked to complete it and mail it to our department. RESULTS: The mean score +/- SD for the degree of pain during biopsy in the periprostatic groups was 2.6 +/- 1.1 and that in the intraprostatic group was 1.9 +/- 1.1, which was significantly different (p <0.001). Other items, including the degree of pain after biopsy, duration and location of pain, and medicine intake for pain, were not significantly different between the 2 groups. There was no significant difference in morbidity, including hematuria, hemospermia and rectal bleeding, between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Intraprostatic administration of local anesthesia significantly decreases the pain associated with prostate biopsy compared with periprostatic nerve block. It is a simple, safe and rapid technique that should be considered in all patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.
Authors: Christian Arsov; Robert Rabenalt; Michael Quentin; Andreas Hiester; Dirk Blondin; Peter Albers; Gerald Antoch; Lars Schimmöller Journal: World J Urol Date: 2015-06-09 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Colin I Tang; Perakaa Sethukavalan; Patrick Cheung; Gerard Morton; Geordi Pang; D Andrew Loblaw Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2013 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Seol Kim; Byung Il Yoon; Su Jin Kim; Hyuk Jin Cho; Hyo Sin Kim; Sung Hoo Hong; Ji Youl Lee; Tae-Kon Hwang; Sae Woong Kim Journal: Korean J Urol Date: 2011-07-24