A Marc Gillinov1. 1. The Center for Atrial Fibrillation, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA. gillinom@ccf.org
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Recent advances in understanding of the pathogenesis of atrial fibrillation and development of new technology have resulted in a surge of interest in the surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation, particularly in patients with mitral valve disease. For patients with both mitral valve dysfunction and atrial fibrillation, a variety of new approaches are available to enable a complete operation that includes both mitral valve repair and ablation of atrial fibrillation. The purposes of this review are to review the rationale for surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) in mitral valve patients, describe the classic Maze procedure and its results, detail new approaches to surgical ablation of AF, emphasize the importance of the left atrial appendage, and consider challenges and future directions in the ablation of AF in mitral valve patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Left untreated, atrial fibrillation increases mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery. While the Maze procedure effectively eliminates atrial fibrillation in most of these patients, its complexity and increased operative time has precluded widespread application. New operations that use alternative energy sources to create left atrial lesion sets ablate atrial fibrillation in 60 to 80% of patients having mitral valve surgery. SUMMARY: In mitral valve patients with atrial fibrillation of more than 6 months' duration, the operative strategy should include both mitral valve surgery and ablation of atrial fibrillation. In many cases, these procedures can be performed minimally invasively. Refinements in mapping and ablation technology are on the horizon, and these will facilitate more widespread application of minimally invasive approaches and further improve results.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Recent advances in understanding of the pathogenesis of atrial fibrillation and development of new technology have resulted in a surge of interest in the surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation, particularly in patients with mitral valve disease. For patients with both mitral valve dysfunction and atrial fibrillation, a variety of new approaches are available to enable a complete operation that includes both mitral valve repair and ablation of atrial fibrillation. The purposes of this review are to review the rationale for surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) in mitral valvepatients, describe the classic Maze procedure and its results, detail new approaches to surgical ablation of AF, emphasize the importance of the left atrial appendage, and consider challenges and future directions in the ablation of AF in mitral valvepatients. RECENT FINDINGS: Left untreated, atrial fibrillation increases mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery. While the Maze procedure effectively eliminates atrial fibrillation in most of these patients, its complexity and increased operative time has precluded widespread application. New operations that use alternative energy sources to create left atrial lesion sets ablate atrial fibrillation in 60 to 80% of patients having mitral valve surgery. SUMMARY: In mitral valvepatients with atrial fibrillation of more than 6 months' duration, the operative strategy should include both mitral valve surgery and ablation of atrial fibrillation. In many cases, these procedures can be performed minimally invasively. Refinements in mapping and ablation technology are on the horizon, and these will facilitate more widespread application of minimally invasive approaches and further improve results.
Authors: Hans Joachim Geissler; Christian Schlensak; Michael Südkamp; Friedhelm Beyersdorf Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2009-03-27 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: A Marc Gillinov; Annetine C Gelijns; Michael K Parides; Joseph J DeRose; Alan J Moskowitz; Pierre Voisine; Gorav Ailawadi; Denis Bouchard; Peter K Smith; Michael J Mack; Michael A Acker; John C Mullen; Eric A Rose; Helena L Chang; John D Puskas; Jean-Philippe Couderc; Timothy J Gardner; Robin Varghese; Keith A Horvath; Steven F Bolling; Robert E Michler; Nancy L Geller; Deborah D Ascheim; Marissa A Miller; Emilia Bagiella; Ellen G Moquete; Paula Williams; Wendy C Taddei-Peters; Patrick T O'Gara; Eugene H Blackstone; Michael Argenziano Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-03-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Eugene H Blackstone; Helena L Chang; Jeevanantham Rajeswaran; Michael K Parides; Hemant Ishwaran; Liang Li; John Ehrlinger; Annetine C Gelijns; Alan J Moskowitz; Michael Argenziano; Joseph J DeRose; Jean-Phillipe Couderc; Dan Balda; François Dagenais; Michael J Mack; Gorav Ailawadi; Peter K Smith; Michael A Acker; Patrick T O'Gara; A Marc Gillinov Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2018-07-27 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Ashok J Shah; Amir Jadidi; Xingpeng Liu; Shinsuke Miyazaki; Andrei Forclaz; Isabelle Nault; Lena Rivard; Nick Linton; Olivier Xhaet; Nicolas Derval; Frederic Sacher; Pierre Bordachar; Philippe Ritter; Meleze Hocini; Pierre Jais; Michel Haissaguerre Journal: Cardiol Res Pract Date: 2010-04-07 Impact factor: 1.866
Authors: Michael Seco; Christopher Cao; Paul Modi; Paul G Bannon; Michael K Wilson; Michael P Vallely; Kevin Phan; Martin Misfeld; Friedrich Mohr; Tristan D Yan Journal: Ann Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2013-11
Authors: Chawannuch Ruaengsri; Matthew R Schill; Timothy S Lancaster; Ali J Khiabani; Joshua L Manghelli; Daniel I Carter; Jason W Greenberg; Spencer J Melby; Richard B Schuessler; Ralph J Damiano Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2018-06-05 Impact factor: 5.209