INTRODUCTION: To assess the efficacy, safety and morbidity of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and fifty-two patients with renal and upper ureteric calculi were included in this study. Sixty-nine patients (71 renal units; group 1) in whom no nephrostomy tube was placed at the conclusion of the procedure was compared with a similar control group of 83 patients (group 2) in whom a nephrostomy tube was placed. Operating time, blood loss, analgesia requirement, puncture site urinary leakage, hospital stay and mean convalescence period were compared in both groups. RESULTS: Both groups were similar with respect to age, sex distribution and stone size. Operating time and blood loss were less in group 1 although they did not reach statistical significance. The mean analgesic requirement, puncture site urinary leakage and hospital stay were significantly less in group 1. CONCLUSION: Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a safe and effective procedure in this selected group of patients.
INTRODUCTION: To assess the efficacy, safety and morbidity of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and fifty-two patients with renal and upper ureteric calculi were included in this study. Sixty-nine patients (71 renal units; group 1) in whom no nephrostomy tube was placed at the conclusion of the procedure was compared with a similar control group of 83 patients (group 2) in whom a nephrostomy tube was placed. Operating time, blood loss, analgesia requirement, puncture site urinary leakage, hospital stay and mean convalescence period were compared in both groups. RESULTS: Both groups were similar with respect to age, sex distribution and stone size. Operating time and blood loss were less in group 1 although they did not reach statistical significance. The mean analgesic requirement, puncture site urinary leakage and hospital stay were significantly less in group 1. CONCLUSION: Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a safe and effective procedure in this selected group of patients.
Authors: Mansur Dağgülli; Ahmet Ali Sancaktutar; Onur Dede; Mehmet Mazhar Utanğaç; Mehmet Nuri Bodakçi; Necmettin Penbegül; Namık Kemal Hatipoğlu; Süleyman Çakmakçı Journal: Urolithiasis Date: 2015-05-23 Impact factor: 3.436
Authors: Murat M Rifaioglu; Kadir Onem; Ibrahim Buldu; Tuna Karatag; Mustafa Okan Istanbulluoglu Journal: Urolithiasis Date: 2014-01-28 Impact factor: 3.436
Authors: Mehmet Nuri Bodakci; Mansur Daggülli; Ahmet Ali Sancaktutar; Haluk Söylemez; Namık Kemal Hatipoglu; Mehmet Mazhar Utangaç; Necmettin Penbegül; Tevfik Ziypak; Yaşar Bozkurt Journal: Urolithiasis Date: 2014-07-09 Impact factor: 3.436
Authors: Ahmet Tefekli; Fatih Altunrende; Kadir Tepeler; Aytul Tas; Sabahattin Aydin; Ahmet Y Muslumanoglu Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2006-12-14 Impact factor: 2.266