Literature DB >> 15710163

Should the tibia be reamed when nailing?

M C Forster1, A S W Bruce, A S Aster.   

Abstract

A systematic review was performed to assess reamed and unreamed tibial nailing. Only prospective, randomised studies comparing reamed and unreamed tibial nailing in adults were included. A literature search found 1200 possible articles. There were seven comparative studies. These articles were independently assessed by all three authors. Three studies met the inclusion criteria. Each outcome measure tested was assessed for heterogeneity. If significant heterogeneity was present, data from the studies was not combined. If there was no significant heterogeneity, a combined odds ratio was calculated using a fixed effects model and a Z-test was performed to test the overall effect. Two hundred and ninety-one tibial shaft fractures were entered into the included studies. Two hundred and eighty (96%) were followed up (148 reamed; 132 unreamed). There was an increased non-union rate when the tibia was not reamed (p = 0.02). Screw breakage was more common in the unreamed group (p<0.0001). This study could find little difference in the incidence of other complications following reamed or unreamed tibial nailing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15710163     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2004.09.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  9 in total

Review 1.  Reamer-irrigator-aspirator indications and clinical results: a systematic review.

Authors:  George Cox; Elena Jones; Dennis McGonagle; Peter V Giannoudis
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Reamed intramedullary exchange nailing in the operative treatment of aseptic tibial shaft nonunion.

Authors:  Christian Hierholzer; Jan Friederichs; Claudio Glowalla; Alexander Woltmann; Volker Bühren; Christian von Rüden
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Fatigue performance of angle-stable tibial nail interlocking screws.

Authors:  Mark Lenz; Boyko Gueorguiev; Robert Geoff Richards; Thomas Mückley; Gunther Olaf Hofmann; Dankward Höntzsch; Markus Windolf
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Prognostic factors for predicting outcomes after intramedullary nailing of the tibia.

Authors:  Emil H Schemitsch; Mohit Bhandari; Gordon Guyatt; David W Sanders; Marc Swiontkowski; Paul Tornetta; Stephen D Walter; Rad Zdero; J C Goslings; David Teague; Kyle Jeray; Michael D McKee
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Randomized trial of reamed and unreamed intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures.

Authors:  Mohit Bhandari; Gordon Guyatt; Paul Tornetta; Emil H Schemitsch; Marc Swiontkowski; David Sanders; Stephen D Walter
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Reamed and unreamed intramedullary nailing for the treatment of open and closed tibial fractures: a subgroup analysis of randomised trials.

Authors:  Deting Xue; Qiang Zheng; Hang Li; Shengjun Qian; Bo Zhang; Zhijun Pan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 7.  [Unreamed intramedullary nailing].

Authors:  R Attal; M Blauth
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  External fixation compared to intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures in the rat.

Authors:  Ulf E W Sigurdsen; Olav Reikeras; Stein Erik Utvag
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Reamed versus unreamed intramedullary nailing for the treatment of femoral fractures: A meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  A-Bing Li; Wei-Jiang Zhang; Wei-Jun Guo; Xin-Hua Wang; Hai-Ming Jin; You-Ming Zhao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.889

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.