Literature DB >> 15709985

Meta-analysis: endoscopic variceal ligation for primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding.

M S Khuroo1, N S Khuroo, K L C Farahat, Y S Khuroo, A A Sofi, S T Dahab.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The treatment effects of primary prophylactic endoscopic variceal ligation are unclear. AIM: To compare the treatment effects of endoscopic variceal ligation and beta-blockers for primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding. In addition, a subgroup analysis was done with the purpose to delineate differences in the effects of intervention that were biologically based.
METHODS: We performed a literature search for randomized controlled trials, which compared the treatment effects of endoscopic variceal ligation with beta-blockers for primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding. Of the 955 articles screened, eight randomized-controlled trials including 596 subjects (285 with endoscopic variceal ligation and 311 with beta-blockers) were analysed. Outcomes measures evaluated were first gastrointestinal bleed, first variceal bleed, all-cause deaths, bleed-related deaths and severe adverse events. The measure of association employed was relative risk; with heterogeneity and sensitivity analyses.
RESULTS: Variceal obliteration was obtained in 261 (91.6%) patients and target beta-blockers therapy was achieved in 294 (94.5%) patients (P = 0.19). Endoscopic variceal ligation compared with beta-blockers significantly reduced rates of first gastrointestinal bleed by 31% (RR, 0.69; 95% CI: 0.49-0.96; P = 0.03; NNTB = 15) and first variceal bleed by 43% (RR, 0.57; 95% CI: 0.38-0.85; P = 0.0067; NNTB = 11). All-cause deaths and bleed-related deaths were unaffected (RR, 1.03; 95% CI: 0.79-1.36; P = 0.81 and RR, 0.84; 95% CI: 0.44-1.61; P = 0.60 respectively). Severe adverse events were significantly less in endoscopic variceal ligation compared with beta-blockers (RR, 0.34; 95% CI: 0.17-0.69; P = 0.0024; NNTB = 28). Sensitivity analysis of five trials published in peer review journals and four trials with high quality showed results similar to those seen in the primary analysis of all the eight trials, confirming stability of conclusions. Following variceal obliteration with endoscopic variceal ligation, oesophageal varices recurred in 83 (29.1%) patients. Seven (28.1%) patients bled with one fatal outcome. In subgroup analyses, endoscopic variceal ligation had significant advantage compared wtih beta-blockers in trials including < or =30% patients with alcoholic cirrhosis, >30% patients with Child Class C cirrhosis and >50% patients with large varices.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cirrhosis with moderate to large varices and who have not bled, endoscopic varices ligation compared with beta-blockers significantly reduced bleeding episodes and severe adverse events, but had no effect on mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15709985     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02346.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0269-2813            Impact factor:   8.171


  36 in total

1.  Outcomes research in gastroenterology and endoscopy.

Authors:  Parantap Gupta; Jonathan M Buscaglia
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-06-16

Review 2.  [Classification and management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding].

Authors:  K Herrlinger
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 3.  Mortality from cirrhosis: lack of progress over the last 35 years.

Authors:  C Gluud
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  [Medical therapy of complications in liver cirrhosis].

Authors:  F Grünhage; J Heller; B Appenrodt; V Schmitz; T Sauerbruch
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 5.  Evolution of endoscopic therapy for esophageal varices.

Authors:  G V Stiegmann
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Comparison of esophageal capsule endoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy for diagnosis of esophageal varices.

Authors:  Catherine T Frenette; John G Kuldau; Donald J Hillebrand; Jill Lane; Paul J Pockros
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Avoiding pitfalls: what an endoscopist should know in liver transplantation--part 1.

Authors:  Sharad Sharma; Ahmet Gurakar; Nicolas Jabbour
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Right liver lobe/albumin ratio: contribution to non-invasive assessment of portal hypertension.

Authors:  Tamara Alempijevic; Vladislava Bulat; Srdjan Djuranovic; Nada Kovacevic; Rada Jesic; Dragan Tomic; Slobodan Krstic; Miodrag Krstic
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Carvedilol versus propranolol effect on hepatic venous pressure gradient at 1 month in patients with index variceal bleed: RCT.

Authors:  Vipin Gupta; Ramakant Rawat; Anoop Saraya
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 6.047

10.  Variceal hemorrhage: Saudi tertiary center experience of clinical presentations, complications and mortality.

Authors:  Hind I Fallatah; Haifaa Al Nahdi; Maan Al Khatabi; Hisham O Akbar; Yousif A Qari; Abdul Rahman Sibiani; Salim Bazaraa
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2012-09-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.