Literature DB >> 15709874

Recognizing people from their movement.

Fani Loula1, Sapna Prasad1, Kent Harber1, Maggie Shiffrar1.   

Abstract

Human observers demonstrate impressive visual sensitivity to human movement. What defines this sensitivity? If motor experience influences the visual analysis of action, then observers should be most sensitive to their own movements. If view-dependent visual experience determines visual sensitivity to human movement, then observers should be most sensitive to the movements of their friends. To test these predictions, participants viewed sagittal displays of point-light depictions of themselves, their friends, and strangers performing various actions. In actor identification and discrimination tasks, sensitivity to one's own motion was highest. Visual sensitivity to friends', but not strangers', actions was above chance. Performance was action dependent. Control studies yielded chance performance with inverted and static displays, suggesting that form and low-motion cues did not define performance. These results suggest that both motor and visual experience define visual sensitivity to human action.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15709874     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.1.210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  80 in total

1.  When emulation becomes reciprocity.

Authors:  Luisa Sartori; Giulia Bucchioni; Umberto Castiello
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 2.  Can biological motion research provide insight on how to reduce friendly fire incidents?

Authors:  Kylie A Steel; David Baxter; Sera Dogramaci; Stephen Cobley; Eathan Ellem
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

3.  Kinematic cues and recognition of self-generated actions.

Authors:  Elena Daprati; Selina Wriessnegger; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Working memory for language is not special: evidence for an articulatory loop for novel stimuli.

Authors:  Margaret Wilson; Glenn Fox
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-06

5.  Detecting deception in a bluffing body: the role of expertise.

Authors:  Natalie Sebanz; Maggie Shiffrar
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

6.  Self versus other in piano performance: detectability of timing perturbations depends on personal playing style.

Authors:  Bruno H Repp; Peter E Keller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Experts see it all: configural effects in action observation.

Authors:  Beatriz Calvo-Merino; Shantel Ehrenberg; Delia Leung; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-10-25

8.  Some considerations about the biological appearance of pacing stimuli in visuomotor finger-tapping tasks.

Authors:  Irene Ruspantini; Alessandro D'Ausilio; Hanna Mäki; Risto J Ilmoniemi
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2011-01-30

9.  Self-recognition of avatar motion: how do I know it's me?

Authors:  Richard Cook; Alan Johnston; Cecilia Heyes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  The role of spatial and temporal information in biological motion perception.

Authors:  Joachim Lange; Markus Lappe
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-07-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.