Literature DB >> 15709562

Interactive on-line continuing medical education: physicians' perceptions and experiences.

Joan Sargeant1, Vernon Curran, Sandra Jarvis-Selinger, Suzanne Ferrier, Michael Allen, Frances Kirby, Kendall Ho.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Although research in continuing medical education (CME) demonstrates positive outcomes of on-line CME programs, the effectiveness of and learners' satisfaction with interpersonal interaction in on-line CME are lower Defined as faculty-learner or learner-learner interpersonal interaction, this study explores physicians' perceptions of and experiences in interactive on-line CME and factors influencing these.
METHODS: Focus groups and interviews were undertaken by three Canadian universities. Using purposive sampling, we recruited physicians based on their experiences with interactive on-line CME. Content analysis was applied first, followed by a comparative analysis to confirm themes and findings.
RESULTS: Physicians based their perceptions of interactive on-line CME by comparing it with what they know best, face-to-face CME. Although perceptions about access and technical competency remained important, two other themes emerged. The first was the capacity of on-line CME to meet individual learning preferences, which, in turn, was influenced by the quality of the program, the degree of self-pacing or self-direction, opportunity for reflection, and educational design. The second was the quality and quantity of interpersonal interaction, which was shaped by perceptions of social comfort, the educational value of interactions, and the role of the facilitator. Prior experience with on-line CME moderated perceptions. DISCUSSION: The extent that on-line CME programs reflected characteristics of high-quality CME and individual learning preferences appeared to shape perceptions about it. It is important to incorporate the characteristics of effective CME into the design and implementation of interactive on-line programs, considering diverse learning preferences, providing faculty development for on-line facilitators, and grounding this work in learning theory.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15709562     DOI: 10.1002/chp.1340240406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Contin Educ Health Prof        ISSN: 0894-1912            Impact factor:   1.355


  14 in total

1.  2007 Guideline for Isolation Precautions: Preventing Transmission of Infectious Agents in Health Care Settings.

Authors:  Jane D Siegel; Emily Rhinehart; Marguerite Jackson; Linda Chiarello
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.918

2.  An instructional seminar for online case-based discussions.

Authors:  Jaclyn M LeBlanc; Maria C Pruchnicki; Stephanie V Rohdieck; Anand Khurma; Joseph F Dasta
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Comparison of methods for teaching developmental milestones to pediatric residents.

Authors:  Marie Leiner; G Prasad Krishnamurthy; O Blanc; B Castillo; I Medina
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 2.764

4.  Evaluating pharmacists' ability to counsel on tobacco cessation using two standardized patient scenarios.

Authors:  Beth A Martin; Betty A Chewning
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2011-01-14

5.  Comparison of Two Learning Modalities on Continuing Medical Education Consumption and Knowledge Acquisition: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Matthew D McEvoy; Leslie C Fowler; Amy Robertson; Brian J Gelfand; Geoffrey M Fleming; Bonnie Miller; Donald Moore
Journal:  J Educ Perioper Med       Date:  2021-07-01

Review 6.  Internet-based medical education: a realist review of what works, for whom and in what circumstances.

Authors:  Geoff Wong; Trisha Greenhalgh; Ray Pawson
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  Hunter disease eClinic: interactive, computer-assisted, problem-based approach to independent learning about a rare genetic disease.

Authors:  Fatma Al-Jasmi; Laura Moldovan; Joe T R Clarke
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  Learner feedback and educational outcomes with an internet-based ambulatory curriculum: a qualitative and quantitative analysis.

Authors:  Stephen D Sisson; Darius A Rastegar; Mark T Hughes; Amanda K Bertram; Hsin Chieh Yeh
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 2.463

9.  General Practitioners' preferences and use of educational media: a German perspective.

Authors:  Horst Christian Vollmar; Monika A Rieger; Martin E Butzlaff; Thomas Ostermann
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-02-16       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  A web-based Alcohol Clinical Training (ACT) curriculum: is in-person faculty development necessary to affect teaching?

Authors:  Daniel P Alford; Jessica M Richardson; Sheila E Chapman; Catherine E Dubé; Robert W Schadt; Richard Saitz
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.