Literature DB >> 15709216

Increasing chemotherapy dose density and intensity: phase I trials in non-small cell lung cancer and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Douglas W Blayney1, Brian W McGuire, Scott E Cruickshank, David H Johnson.   

Abstract

Dose densification and dose escalation of cytotoxic chemotherapy may be important in improving the cure rates of chemotherapy-responsive cancers. We conducted two phase I studies, in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and in lymphoma, to explore the possibility of intensifying chemotherapy by compressing the delivery of and escalating the dose of standard combination chemotherapy. One study used etoposide and cisplatin chemotherapy in patients with unresectable stage III or IV NSCLC, intensifying chemotherapy by reducing the cycle length. The second study used cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone, CHOP chemotherapy, in the treatment of stage II-IV intermediate or immunoblastic high-grade lymphoma, intensifying chemotherapy first by reducing the cycle length and then by escalating the dosages of cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin. Filgrastim support was used during dose intensification. Fifty-five patients with NSCLC and 49 with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) were enrolled and treated in successive cohorts. At standard dosages and intervals of chemotherapy, filgrastim support resulted in incidences of grade 3 and 4 neutropenia that were between 62% and 77% lower than those in the no-filgrastim control; the mean duration of neutropenia was, likewise, more than 80% lower. Absolute neutrophil counts were >/=2 x 10(9)/l at day 14 in virtually 100% of patients receiving filgrastim. In the NSCLC trial, etoposide and cisplatin were intensified by >50%, and in the lymphoma trial, cyclophosphamide was intensified by 270% and doxorubicin was intensified by 87%. Chemotherapy reductions or delays for neutropenia were rare in the groups receiving filgrastim; but at higher chemotherapy intensities, dose-limiting thrombocytopenia was encountered. We conclude that the delivery of myelosuppressive chemotherapy in both a dose-intense and a dose-dense manner is feasible with filgrastim support.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15709216     DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.10-2-138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  10 in total

1.  Dose dense (CEOP-14) vs dose dense and rituximab (CEOP-14 +R) in high-risk diffuse large cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Agustin Avilés; María J Nambo; Natividad Neri; Sergio Cleto; Claudia Castañeda; Judith Huerta-Guzmàn; Edgar Murillo; Margarita Contreras; Alejandra Talavera; Martha González
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modelling of the novel human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor derivative Maxy-G34 and pegfilgrastim in rats.

Authors:  M Scholz; C Engel; D Apt; S L Sankar; E Goldstein; M Loeffler
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 6.831

3.  Structure-activity relationships between the Aconitum C20-diterpenoid alkaloid derivatives and the growth suppressive activities of Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma Raji cells and human hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells.

Authors:  Masaharu Hazawa; Kenji Takahashi; Koji Wada; Takao Mori; Norio Kawahara; Ikuo Kashiwakura
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 3.850

4.  A pharmacokinetic model of filgrastim and pegfilgrastim application in normal mice and those with cyclophosphamide-induced granulocytopaenia.

Authors:  M Scholz; M Ackermann; C Engel; F Emmrich; M Loeffler; M Kamprad
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2009-08-17       Impact factor: 6.831

5.  Dose-dense cisplatin-based chemotherapy and surgery for children with high-risk hepatoblastoma (SIOPEL-4): a prospective, single-arm, feasibility study.

Authors:  József Zsiros; Laurence Brugieres; Penelope Brock; Derek Roebuck; Rudolf Maibach; Arthur Zimmermann; Margaret Childs; Daniele Pariente; Veronique Laithier; Jean-Bernard Otte; Sophie Branchereau; Daniel Aronson; Arun Rangaswami; Milind Ronghe; Michela Casanova; Michael Sullivan; Bruce Morland; Piotr Czauderna; Giorgio Perilongo
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 6.  A systematic literature review of the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of filgrastim.

Authors:  David C Dale; Jeffrey Crawford; Zandra Klippel; Maureen Reiner; Timothy Osslund; Ellen Fan; Phuong Khanh Morrow; Kim Allcott; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Efficacy and Safety of a Single Dose versus a Multiple Dose Regimen of Mebendazole against Hookworm Infections in Children: A Randomised, Double-blind Trial.

Authors:  Marta S Palmeirim; Shaali M Ame; Said M Ali; Jan Hattendorf; Jennifer Keiser
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2018-07-11

8.  Pegfilgrastim in Supportive Care of Hodgkin Lymphoma.

Authors:  Claudio Cerchione; Davide Nappi; Alessandra Romano; Giovanni Martinelli
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 6.575

9.  Effectiveness of cytopenia prophylaxis for different filgrastim and pegfilgrastim schedules in a chemotherapy mouse model.

Authors:  Markus Scholz; Manuela Ackermann; Frank Emmrich; Markus Loeffler; Manja Kamprad
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2009-07-13

10.  Model-based optimization of G-CSF treatment during cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Authors:  Sibylle Schirm; Christoph Engel; Sibylle Loibl; Markus Loeffler; Markus Scholz
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-11-04       Impact factor: 4.553

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.