Literature DB >> 15709211

Molecular imaging of antiangiogenic agents.

Shazza Rehman1, Gordon C Jayson.   

Abstract

Many novel antiangiogenic agents are currently in various phases of clinical testing. These agents tend to be cytostatic, and therefore few responses are observed with conventional imaging by computerized tomography. Furthermore, toxicity with these agents is seen when the maximum-tolerated dose is combined with chemotherapy. Hence, there is a need to develop imaging strategies that can determine the minimum and optimum biologically active doses. There is increasing awareness of the need to obtain evidence of drug activity through the use of surrogate markers of the biologic mechanism of action during early clinical trials, in addition to determining the pharmacokinetics, toxicity profile, and maximum-tolerated dose. One of the major impediments to the rapid development of antiangiogenic agents in the past has been the lack of validated assays capable of measuring an antiangiogenic effect directly in patients. Recently, dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) has emerged as a useful technique for noninvasive imaging of tumor vasculature in preclinical and clinical models. The problem of tumor heterogeneity remains to be addressed. The major challenge is the standardization of the technique worldwide for the purpose of early clinical studies that are likely to be multicenter. Convincing data on correlations between changes observed through molecular imaging and changes in tumor angiogenesis, and hence tumor biology, are still lacking. Whether this would translate into a survival advantage remains to be seen. The ultimate test of the surrogate biological end points determined by molecular imaging will occur in randomized phase III trials. Results of the first randomized trial that showed a survival advantage in favor of antiangiogenic agents were released at the American Society of Clinical Oncology meeting in 2003. There it was reported that the combination of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (Camptosar; Pfizer Pharmaceuticals; New York, NY) with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody (bevacizumab-Avastin; Genentech, Inc.; South San Francisco, CA) was superior to the chemotherapy regimen alone when used to treat patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. However, until further phase III clinical trials confirm these results, surrogate end points of clinical efficacy of the newer agents are urgently needed so that development of ineffective drugs can be halted early. This review briefly discusses the role of molecular imaging in general, and DCE-MRI in particular, in relation to treatment with antiangiogenic agents and highlights some of the difficulties encountered in this area.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15709211     DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.10-2-92

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  35 in total

1.  Albumin-based nanoparticles as magnetic resonance contrast agents: II. Physicochemical characterisation of purified and standardised nanoparticles.

Authors:  A A Abdelmoez; G C Thurner; E A Wallnöfer; N Klammsteiner; C Kremser; H Talasz; M Mrakovcic; E Fröhlich; W Jaschke; P Debbage
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 4.304

2.  Structure-activity relationships of the human prothrombin kringle-2 peptide derivative NSA9: anti-proliferative activity and cellular internalization.

Authors:  Hyun Sook Hwang; Dong Won Kim; Soung Soo Kim
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 3.  Antiangiogenic therapy in human gastrointestinal malignancies.

Authors:  J Heidemann; D G Binion; W Domschke; T Kucharzik
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  [Molecular imaging of tumor blood vessels].

Authors:  D Tilki; B Singer; M Seitz; C G Stief; S Ergün
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  In vivo magnetic resonance imaging of vascularization in islet transplantation.

Authors:  Eba Hathout; Lawrence Sowers; Rong Wang; Annie Tan; John Mace; Ricardo Peverini; Richard Chinnock; Andre Obenaus
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2007-09-10       Impact factor: 3.782

Review 6.  Imaging angiogenesis of genitourinary tumors.

Authors:  Ying-Kiat Zee; James P B O'Connor; Geoff J M Parker; Alan Jackson; Andrew R Clamp; M Ben Taylor; Noel W Clarke; Gordon C Jayson
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  Assessing treatment response in triple-negative breast cancer from quantitative image analysis in perfusion magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Imon Banerjee; Sadhika Malladi; Daniela Lee; Adrien Depeursinge; Melinda Telli; Jafi Lipson; Daniel Golden; Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-11-02

8.  Optical molecular imaging approach for rapid assessment of response of individual cancer cells to chemotherapy.

Authors:  Zhen Luo; Rohan Vijay Tikekar; Kiana Michelle Samadzadeh; Nitin Nitin
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.170

9.  Can increased tumoral vascularity be a quantitative predicting factor of lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma?

Authors:  Hyun Joo Shin; Eun-Kyung Kim; Hee Jung Moon; Jung Hyun Yoon; Kyung Hwa Han; Jin Young Kwak
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 3.633

10.  Synthesis and in vitro evaluation of [18F](R)-FEPAQ: a potential PET ligand for VEGFR2.

Authors:  Jaya Prabhakaran; Victoria Arango; Vattoly J Majo; Norman R Simpson; Suham A Kassir; Mark D Underwood; Hanish Polavarapu; Jeffrey N Bruce; Peter Canoll; J John Mann; J S Dileep Kumar
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 2.823

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.