BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Our purpose was to evaluate the effect of fixative on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and anisotropy within spinal cord white matter. As glutaraldehyde (GL) better preserves axonal ultrastructure as compared with paraformaldehyde (PF), we hypothesize that spinal cord white matter fixed with GL will have increased anisotropic water diffusion as compared with specimens fixed with PF. METHODS: Eleven rats were perfusion-fixed with either 4% PF or a combination of 2.5% GL and 4% PF. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the ex vivo spinal cord was performed using a 9.4T magnet with b values up to 3100 s/mm(2). In-plane resolution was 39 mum x 39 mum, and section thickness was 500 mum. RESULTS: Overall, animals fixed with a combination of GL and PF (GL-PF) showed a greater increase in longitudinal ADC (lADC) as compared to those fixed with PF only, without differences in transverse ADC (tADC). As a consequence of the increased lADC, overall anisotropic diffusion increased in those animals fixed with GL-PF, as measured with an anisotropy index (AI = tADC/lADC). Evaluation of specific tracts demonstrated that lADC for animals fixed with GL-PF were significantly elevated in the rubrospinal, vestibulospinal, and reticulospinal tracts as compared with animals fixed with PF only. CONCLUSION: Using a fixative of GL-PL results in increased anisotropy (decreased AI values) in spinal cord white matter tracts, as compared with PF fixation only, largely owing to increases in the lADC values. This finding may be due to better fixation of intra-axonal cytoskeletal proteins that results when GL is combined with PF and sheds further light on underlying sources of anisotropic water diffusion in CNS white matter.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Our purpose was to evaluate the effect of fixative on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and anisotropy within spinal cord white matter. As glutaraldehyde (GL) better preserves axonal ultrastructure as compared with paraformaldehyde (PF), we hypothesize that spinal cord white matter fixed with GL will have increased anisotropic water diffusion as compared with specimens fixed with PF. METHODS: Eleven rats were perfusion-fixed with either 4% PF or a combination of 2.5% GL and 4% PF. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the ex vivo spinal cord was performed using a 9.4T magnet with b values up to 3100 s/mm(2). In-plane resolution was 39 mum x 39 mum, and section thickness was 500 mum. RESULTS: Overall, animals fixed with a combination of GL and PF (GL-PF) showed a greater increase in longitudinal ADC (lADC) as compared to those fixed with PF only, without differences in transverse ADC (tADC). As a consequence of the increased lADC, overall anisotropic diffusion increased in those animals fixed with GL-PF, as measured with an anisotropy index (AI = tADC/lADC). Evaluation of specific tracts demonstrated that lADC for animals fixed with GL-PF were significantly elevated in the rubrospinal, vestibulospinal, and reticulospinal tracts as compared with animals fixed with PF only. CONCLUSION: Using a fixative of GL-PL results in increased anisotropy (decreased AI values) in spinal cord white matter tracts, as compared with PF fixation only, largely owing to increases in the lADC values. This finding may be due to better fixation of intra-axonal cytoskeletal proteins that results when GL is combined with PF and sheds further light on underlying sources of anisotropic water diffusion in CNS white matter.
Authors: Konstantinos Arfanakis; Victor M Haughton; John D Carew; Baxter P Rogers; Robert J Dempsey; M Elizabeth Meyerand Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Eric D Schwartz; Jed S Shumsky; Suzanne Wehrli; Alan Tessler; Marion Murray; David B Hackney Journal: Exp Neurol Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 5.330
Authors: S M Hesseltine; M Law; J Babb; M Rad; S Lopez; Y Ge; G Johnson; R I Grossman Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2006 Jun-Jul Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Henry H Ong; Alex C Wright; Suzanne L Wehrli; Andre Souza; Eric D Schwartz; Scott N Hwang; Felix W Wehrli Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2008-01-26 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Daniel Lammertse; David Dungan; James Dreisbach; Scott Falci; Adam Flanders; Ralph Marino; Eric Schwartz Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2007 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: Junqian Xu; Joshua S Shimony; Eric C Klawiter; Abraham Z Snyder; Kathryn Trinkaus; Robert T Naismith; Tammie L S Benzinger; Anne H Cross; Sheng-Kwei Song Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2012-11-21 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Junzhong Xu; Hua Li; Kevin D Harkins; Xiaoyu Jiang; Jingping Xie; Hakmook Kang; Mark D Does; John C Gore Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2014-09-16 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Junzhong Xu; Hua Li; Ke Li; Kevin D Harkins; Xiaoyu Jiang; Jingping Xie; Hakmook Kang; Richard D Dortch; Adam W Anderson; Mark D Does; John C Gore Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2016-01-19 Impact factor: 4.044