BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In children, MR imaging abnormalities consistent with leukoencephalopathy after treatment for hematologic malignancy do not correlate with neurologic dysfunction and are often overinterpreted with regard to clinical significance. We hypothesized that this would also be true in primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) patients who attained a complete response (CR) after treatment with chemotherapy and osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption (BBBD). We hypothesized that cognitive function loss measured after tissue diagnosis but before BBBD-enhanced chemotherapy could be correlated with brain changes visualized by imaging, whereas a correlation would not be present after therapy if the patient attained a complete tumor response, analogous to the findings in children. METHODS: Sixteen primary CNS lymphoma patients were followed after CR (no enhancing tumor) by using a methotrexate-based regimen. Neuropsychological (NP) cognitive testing and MR imaging or CT (when MR imaging was not available) were performed before treatment and at completion of the 12-month treatment for each patient. Thereafter, the same studies were available for nine of these 16 CR patients, who were followed for a median of 55 months. Zone I was defined as enhancing tumor, and zone II as surrounding abnormal MR T2 signal intensity or low-attenuation CT. The cognitive scores were converted to Z scores and the MR T2 signal intensity or CT low-attenuated changes were converted to a summary zone II abnormality score. RESULTS: A significant association between neurocognitive data and zone II abnormality was found at baseline after tissue diagnosis but before chemotherapy (r = -.55; P < .028), but no correlation existed at end of treatment. Imaging studies showed that seven patients developed a new T2 or low-attenuation abnormality by the end of treatment, whereas 15 patients showed a decrease, stable appearance, or complete resolution of their baseline zone II abnormality by end of treatment. Although cognitive loss compared with age-matched control subjects was common before starting therapy, by the end of treatment all patients' cognitive function improved significantly (P < .005). CONCLUSION: The current data suggest that neither enhanced chemotherapy delivery nor changes in MR imaging T2 signal intensity or CT low attenuation, in PCNSL patients who attained a CR, were associated with a decrease in cognitive function.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In children, MR imaging abnormalities consistent with leukoencephalopathy after treatment for hematologic malignancy do not correlate with neurologic dysfunction and are often overinterpreted with regard to clinical significance. We hypothesized that this would also be true in primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) patients who attained a complete response (CR) after treatment with chemotherapy and osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption (BBBD). We hypothesized that cognitive function loss measured after tissue diagnosis but before BBBD-enhanced chemotherapy could be correlated with brain changes visualized by imaging, whereas a correlation would not be present after therapy if the patient attained a complete tumor response, analogous to the findings in children. METHODS: Sixteen primary CNS lymphomapatients were followed after CR (no enhancing tumor) by using a methotrexate-based regimen. Neuropsychological (NP) cognitive testing and MR imaging or CT (when MR imaging was not available) were performed before treatment and at completion of the 12-month treatment for each patient. Thereafter, the same studies were available for nine of these 16 CR patients, who were followed for a median of 55 months. Zone I was defined as enhancing tumor, and zone II as surrounding abnormal MR T2 signal intensity or low-attenuation CT. The cognitive scores were converted to Z scores and the MR T2 signal intensity or CT low-attenuated changes were converted to a summary zone II abnormality score. RESULTS: A significant association between neurocognitive data and zone II abnormality was found at baseline after tissue diagnosis but before chemotherapy (r = -.55; P < .028), but no correlation existed at end of treatment. Imaging studies showed that seven patients developed a new T2 or low-attenuation abnormality by the end of treatment, whereas 15 patients showed a decrease, stable appearance, or complete resolution of their baseline zone II abnormality by end of treatment. Although cognitive loss compared with age-matched control subjects was common before starting therapy, by the end of treatment all patients' cognitive function improved significantly (P < .005). CONCLUSION: The current data suggest that neither enhanced chemotherapy delivery nor changes in MR imaging T2 signal intensity or CT low attenuation, in PCNSL patients who attained a CR, were associated with a decrease in cognitive function.
Authors: J Y Blay; T Conroy; C Chevreau; A Thyss; N Quesnel; H Eghbali; R Bouabdallah; B Coiffier; J P Wagner; A Le Mevel; D Dramais-Marcel; E Baumelou; F Chauvin; P Biron Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1998-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Brenda J Spiegler; Eric Bouffet; Mark L Greenberg; James T Rutka; Donald J Mabbott Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-02-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: K Matsumoto; S Takahashi; A Sato; M Imaizumi; S Higano; K Sakamoto; H Asakawa; K Tada Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1995-07-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Nicholas Szerlip; Charles Rutter; Nilam Ram; Susannah Yovino; Young Kwok; William Maggio; William F Regine Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2010-08-20 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Nancy D Doolittle; Agnieszka Korfel; Meredith A Lubow; Elisabeth Schorb; Uwe Schlegel; Sabine Rogowski; Rongwei Fu; Edit Dósa; Gerald Illerhaus; Dale F Kraemer; Leslie L Muldoon; Pasquale Calabrese; Nancy Hedrick; Rose Marie Tyson; Kristoph Jahnke; Leeza M Maron; Robert W Butler; Edward A Neuwelt Journal: Neurology Date: 2013-05-17 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Daniel J Guillaume; Nancy D Doolittle; Seymur Gahramanov; Nancy A Hedrick; Johnny B Delashaw; Edward A Neuwelt Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: John A Boockvar; Apostolos J Tsiouris; Christoph P Hofstetter; Ilhami Kovanlikaya; Sherese Fralin; Kartik Kesavabhotla; Stephen M Seedial; Susan C Pannullo; Theodore H Schwartz; Philip Stieg; Robert D Zimmerman; Jared Knopman; Ronald J Scheff; Paul Christos; Shankar Vallabhajosula; Howard A Riina Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2010-10-22 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Lilyana Angelov; Nancy D Doolittle; Dale F Kraemer; Tali Siegal; Gene H Barnett; David M Peereboom; Glen Stevens; John McGregor; Kristoph Jahnke; Cynthia A Lacy; Nancy A Hedrick; Edna Shalom; Sandra Ference; Susan Bell; Lisa Sorenson; Rose Marie Tyson; Marianne Haluska; Edward A Neuwelt Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-05-18 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Hendrik Pels; Annika Juergens; Axel Glasmacher; Holger Schulz; Andreas Engert; Michael Linnebank; Gabriele Schackert; Heinz Reichmann; Frank Kroschinsky; Marlies Vogt-Schaden; Gerlinde Egerer; Udo Bode; Carlo Schaller; Monika Lamprecht; Peter Hau; Martina Deckert; Rolf Fimmers; Christopher Bangard; Ingo G H Schmidt-Wolf; Uwe Schlegel Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2008-10-18 Impact factor: 4.130