W J Taylor1. 1. Rehabilitation Teaching and Research Unit, Wellington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago, PO Box 7343, Wellington, New Zealand. wtaylor@wnmeds.ac.nz
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop a consensus based set of core domains for outcome studies in psoriatic arthritis. METHODS: A list of 26 potential domains was prepared through literature review and email discussions amongst the GRAPPA steering committee members and scored by rheumatologists identified through membership of the CASPAR study and the steering committee. Each participant was emailed an up to date review of outcome measures in psoriatic arthritis and asked to distribute 100 points amongst each potential domain. In two subsequent rounds the group median, interquartile range, and earlier responses were emailed to each respondent to provide an opportunity to revise their scoring. RESULTS: Thirty two participants responded to the first round, of whom 30 responded to the third round. For DC-ART, the highest scoring domains were actively inflamed joint count, radiological damage score, patient global assessment, pain, physical function, acute phase response, and quality of life (scores 7 to 12). For SMARD, the highest scoring domains were pain, patient global assessment, physical function, quality of life, and active joint count (scores 10 to 18). For clinical record keeping, three domains scored highly at 10 (pain, patient global assessment, and active joint count). For rehabilitation, the highest scoring domains were physical function, quality of life, pain, patient global assessment, work limitations, and work incapacity (scores 10 to 15). CONCLUSION: Amongst rheumatologists with an interest in psoriatic arthritis, a reduced list of potential standard outcome domains have been defined by Delphi consensus methods.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a consensus based set of core domains for outcome studies in psoriatic arthritis. METHODS: A list of 26 potential domains was prepared through literature review and email discussions amongst the GRAPPA steering committee members and scored by rheumatologists identified through membership of the CASPAR study and the steering committee. Each participant was emailed an up to date review of outcome measures in psoriatic arthritis and asked to distribute 100 points amongst each potential domain. In two subsequent rounds the group median, interquartile range, and earlier responses were emailed to each respondent to provide an opportunity to revise their scoring. RESULTS: Thirty two participants responded to the first round, of whom 30 responded to the third round. For DC-ART, the highest scoring domains were actively inflamed joint count, radiological damage score, patient global assessment, pain, physical function, acute phase response, and quality of life (scores 7 to 12). For SMARD, the highest scoring domains were pain, patient global assessment, physical function, quality of life, and active joint count (scores 10 to 18). For clinical record keeping, three domains scored highly at 10 (pain, patient global assessment, and active joint count). For rehabilitation, the highest scoring domains were physical function, quality of life, pain, patient global assessment, work limitations, and work incapacity (scores 10 to 15). CONCLUSION: Amongst rheumatologists with an interest in psoriatic arthritis, a reduced list of potential standard outcome domains have been defined by Delphi consensus methods.
Authors: N Bellamy; J Kirwan; M Boers; P Brooks; V Strand; P Tugwell; R Altman; K Brandt; M Dougados; M Lequesne Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 1997-04 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi; Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano; Ameeta Retzer; Philip N Newsome; Christopher D Buckley; Melanie J Calvert Journal: Trials Date: 2022-01-15 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Lianne D Peppel; Majanka H Heijenbrok-Kal; Thomas A Van Essen; Godard C W De Ruiter; Wilco C Peul; Gerard M Ribbers Journal: J Rehabil Med Date: 2022-01-11 Impact factor: 2.912
Authors: Nicola Luigi Bragazzi; Charlie Bridgewood; Abdulla Watad; Giovanni Damiani; Dennis McGonagle Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2022-04-22 Impact factor: 8.786
Authors: William Tillett; Ade Adebajo; Mel Brooke; Willemina Campbell; Laura C Coates; Oliver FitzGerald; Laure Gossec; Philip Helliwell; Sarah Hewlett; Jana James; Patricia Minnock; Aisling Reast; Dennis O'Sullivan; Maarten de Wit; Neil McHugh Journal: Curr Rheumatol Rep Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 4.592