BACKGROUND/ METHOD: The analytical validity of free testosterone (FTe) analog immunoassays is subject to much controversy. We revisited the validation of 4 analog assays and 1 FTe calculation procedure with a metrologically traceable reference measurement procedure (RMP) based on ultrafiltration and isotope dilution-mass spectrometry for direct measurement of Te in the ultrafiltrate. To this end, we performed split-sample measurements of 40 male sera. RESULTS: Deming regression showed that 3 of the immunoassays had moderate to good correlation (0.8474 < or = r < or = 0.9241) with the RMP; however, the slope was markedly below 1. The FTe calculation procedure was in good agreement with this result. The Sy/x values for all assays were higher than the combined imprecision values, which indicate their susceptibility to matrix-related effects. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated substantial differences in analytical quality of FTe assays; however, the results suggested that after extending the validation with a larger variety of samples, recalibration of some analog assays might be worth further investigation.
BACKGROUND/ METHOD: The analytical validity of freetestosterone (FTe) analog immunoassays is subject to much controversy. We revisited the validation of 4 analog assays and 1 FTe calculation procedure with a metrologically traceable reference measurement procedure (RMP) based on ultrafiltration and isotope dilution-mass spectrometry for direct measurement of Te in the ultrafiltrate. To this end, we performed split-sample measurements of 40 male sera. RESULTS: Deming regression showed that 3 of the immunoassays had moderate to good correlation (0.8474 < or = r < or = 0.9241) with the RMP; however, the slope was markedly below 1. The FTe calculation procedure was in good agreement with this result. The Sy/x values for all assays were higher than the combined imprecision values, which indicate their susceptibility to matrix-related effects. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated substantial differences in analytical quality of FTe assays; however, the results suggested that after extending the validation with a larger variety of samples, recalibration of some analog assays might be worth further investigation.
Authors: L Antonio; D Vanderschueren; N Narinx; K David; J Walravens; P Vermeersch; F Claessens; T Fiers; B Lapauw Journal: Cell Mol Life Sci Date: 2022-10-07 Impact factor: 9.207
Authors: Myrna Buenaluz-Sedurante; Mark Isaiah K Co; Daryl Jade T Dagang; Racquel G Bruno; Annie Jane N Sarmiento; Michael L Tee Journal: Int J Endocrinol Date: 2020-11-28 Impact factor: 3.257