PURPOSE: To document demographic characteristics of current residents, career motivations and aspirations, and training program policies and resources. METHODS: In 2003, the Association of Residents in Radiation Oncology (ARRO) conducted two nationwide surveys: one of all U.S. radiation oncology residents and one of chief residents. RESULTS: The Chief Residents' Survey was completed by representatives from all 77 programs (response rate, 100%). The Residents' Survey was returned by 229 respondents (response rate, 44%). In each, 32% of respondents were female. The most popular career after residency was private practice (46%), followed by permanent academic practice (28%). Changes that would entice those choosing private practice to consider an academic career included more research experience as a resident (76%), higher likelihood of tenure (69%), lesser time commitment (66%), and higher salary (54%). Although the majority of respondents were satisfied with educational experience overall, a number of programs were reported to provide fewer resources than required. CONCLUSIONS: Median program resources and numbers of outliers are documented to allow residents and program directors to assess the relative adequacy of experience in their own programs. Policy-making bodies and individual programs should consider these results when developing interventions to improve educational experiences of residents and to increase retention of radiation oncologists in academic practice.
PURPOSE: To document demographic characteristics of current residents, career motivations and aspirations, and training program policies and resources. METHODS: In 2003, the Association of Residents in Radiation Oncology (ARRO) conducted two nationwide surveys: one of all U.S. radiation oncology residents and one of chief residents. RESULTS: The Chief Residents' Survey was completed by representatives from all 77 programs (response rate, 100%). The Residents' Survey was returned by 229 respondents (response rate, 44%). In each, 32% of respondents were female. The most popular career after residency was private practice (46%), followed by permanent academic practice (28%). Changes that would entice those choosing private practice to consider an academic career included more research experience as a resident (76%), higher likelihood of tenure (69%), lesser time commitment (66%), and higher salary (54%). Although the majority of respondents were satisfied with educational experience overall, a number of programs were reported to provide fewer resources than required. CONCLUSIONS: Median program resources and numbers of outliers are documented to allow residents and program directors to assess the relative adequacy of experience in their own programs. Policy-making bodies and individual programs should consider these results when developing interventions to improve educational experiences of residents and to increase retention of radiation oncologists in academic practice.
Authors: Jean-Christophe Faivre; Jean-Emmanuel Bibault; Thomas Leroy; Mikaël Agopiantz; Julia Salleron; Maxime Wack; Guillaume Janoray; Henri Roché; Stéphane Culine; Sofia Rivera Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Christine H Feng; Corinne McDaniels-Davidson; Maria Elena Martinez; Jesse Nodora; Arno J Mundt; Jyoti S Mayadev Journal: J Contemp Brachytherapy Date: 2021-12-30