Literature DB >> 15708148

Initial experience using an endoscopic simulator to train surgical residents in flexible endoscopy in a community medical center residency program.

Justin A Clark1, Japa A Volchok, Jeffrey W Hazey, Parvis J Sadighi, Robert D Fanelli.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The importance of training surgical residents in GI endoscopy has been recognized for years. Despite advice from SAGES and the RRC, few programs have managed to incorporate effective flexible endoscopy training into their curriculum, making it difficult for their graduates to be credentialed in GI endoscopy. Prior to October 2001, our residents obtained their entire clinical experience in the endoscopy unit with staff surgical endoscopists. Attendance was inconsistent because of their many other responsibilities, and residents often used much of their clinical endoscopic exposure gaining basic familiarity with the equipment, precluding the development of therapeutic facility. Since October 2001, we have used the Simbionix endoscopic simulator to supplement resident training in GI endoscopy. With the advent of virtual-reality simulators, and studies validating their effectiveness in teaching fundamental technical skills, we report our initial success in implementing a formal GI endoscopy curriculum using a virtual reality endoscopic simulator to provide basic experience before the clinical endoscopic experience begins.
METHODS: Residents are given monthly assignments of simulated cases on the GI Mentor simulator. Junior residents complete the diagnostic case modules; senior residents complete the therapeutic modules. Data were accumulated over the course of two years with a total of five PGY-I and eight senior surgical residents completing assigned cases on the simulator. Objective criteria were measured from their performance on the simulator to determine the efficiency of the examination for each case completed.
RESULTS: Preliminary data collected over the course of two years indicates that residents improve the efficiency of their endoscopic examinations over time as measured by objective criteria. Junior surgery residents attained an aggregate average of 59% efficiency in their examinations whereas senior surgical residents who had previous experience with the simulator, attained an aggregate efficiency of 80%.
CONCLUSIONS: A formal flexible endoscopy curriculum enhances surgical resident training and positively impacts careers in general and gastrointestinal surgery. Endoscopic simulators allow surgical residents to master the technical aspects of GI endoscopy quickly, thereby permitting them more benefit from their clinical exposure in the endoscopy unit. We anticipate that our formal curriculum in GI endoscopy training will prepare our graduates well for careers that include flexible endoscopy as a component of their clinical practices, and position them to be credentialled in GI endoscopy upon graduation.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15708148     DOI: 10.1016/j.cursur.2004.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Surg        ISSN: 0149-7944


  11 in total

1.  Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Skills (GAGES): a valid measurement tool for technical skills in flexible endoscopy.

Authors:  Melina C Vassiliou; Pepa A Kaneva; Benjamin K Poulose; Brian J Dunkin; Jeffrey M Marks; Riadh Sadik; Gideon Sroka; Mehran Anvari; Klaus Thaler; Gina L Adrales; Jeffrey W Hazey; Jenifer R Lightdale; Vic Velanovich; Lee L Swanstrom; John D Mellinger; Gerald M Fried
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Role of virtual reality simulation in endoscopy training.

Authors:  Louis Harpham-Lockyer; Faidon-Marios Laskaratos; Pasquale Berlingieri; Owen Epstein
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-12-10

3.  Visuospatial abilities correlate with performance of senior endoscopy specialist in simulated colonoscopy.

Authors:  Bo Westman; E Matt Ritter; Ann Kjellin; Leif Törkvist; Torsten Wredmark; Li Felländer-Tsai; Lars Enochsson
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Canadian credentialing guidelines for esophagogastroduodenoscopy.

Authors:  Terry Ponich; Robert Enns; Joseph Romagnuolo; Jonathan Springer; David Armstrong; Alan N Barkun
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 5.  Systematic review of the implementation of simulation training in surgical residency curriculum.

Authors:  Yo Kurashima; Satoshi Hirano
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Expert benchmark for the GI Mentor II.

Authors:  Roy Phitayakorn; Jeffrey M Marks; Harry L Reynolds; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Assessing resident performance and training of colonoscopy in a general surgery training program.

Authors:  William W Hope; W Borden Hooks; S Nicole Kilbourne; Ashley Adams; Cyrus A Kotwall; Thomas V Clancy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  How, for Whom, and in Which Contexts or Conditions Augmented and Virtual Reality Training Works in Upskilling Health Care Workers: Realist Synthesis.

Authors:  Norina Gasteiger; Sabine N van der Veer; Paul Wilson; Dawn Dowding
Journal:  JMIR Serious Games       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 4.143

9.  Teaching and assessing procedural skills: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Claire Touchie; Susan Humphrey-Murto; Lara Varpio
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 2.463

Review 10.  Effective colonoscopy training techniques: strategies to improve patient outcomes.

Authors:  Ioannis S Papanikolaou; Pantelis S Karatzas; Lazaros T Varytimiadis; Athanasios Tsigaridas; Michail Galanopoulos; Nikos Viazis; Dimitrios G Karamanolis
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2016-03-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.