Literature DB >> 15708102

Aseptic peritonitis due to peptidoglycan contamination of pharmacopoeia standard dialysis solution.

Leo Martis1, Mehul Patel, Joe Giertych, Jim Mongoven, Michel Taminne, Michele A Perrier, Omar Mendoza, Niranjan Goud, Aidan Costigan, Nicole Denjoy, Christian Verger, William F Owen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Manufacturers of parenteral solutions adhere to European and US Pharmacopoeia standards to define safety and sterility. In response to excess cases of aseptic peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis patients using icodextrin-containing dialysate that met all pharmacopoeia standards, a global recall was issued in May, 2002. We aimed to establish the cause of aseptic peritonitis.
METHODS: We analysed 186 reports of aseptic peritonitis between September, 2001, and January, 2003. Extensive physical, chemical, and microbiological investigations of recalled dialysate were done. We calculated dose-response curves for peptidoglycan-induced interleukin 6 elaboration in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from healthy donors and for sterile peritonitis in rats.
FINDINGS: Although its chemical constituents and concentrations of endotoxin were within pharmacopoeia specifications, the dialysis solution elicited an interlukin 6 response in vivo and in vitro. We identified peptidoglycan from thermophilic acidophilic bacteria (Alicyclobacillus acidocaldarius) as the contaminating proinflammatory substance. In the PBMC assay, strong dose-response relations were noted between peptidoglycan concentrations and interleukin 6. In rats injected with peptidoglycan, dose-dependent increases of intraperitoneal neutrophils and pyrogenic cytokines were recorded. We measured a positive relation between peptidoglycan concentrations in recalled dialysate and reports of aseptic peritonitis. After implementation of corrective actions, the rate of peritonitis returned to baseline.
INTERPRETATION: Excess cases of aseptic peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis patients were due to peptidoglycan contamination of dialysate by Alicyclobacillus. This outbreak serves as an example of how contemporary parenteral products with microbial contaminants can be considered safe under current pharmacopoeia tests, but provoke adverse clinical effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15708102     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17908-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  19 in total

1.  "NEPP" peritoneal dialysis regimen has beneficial effects on plasma CEL and 3-DG, but not pentosidine, CML, and MGO.

Authors:  Caatje Y le Poole; Frans J van Ittersum; Rob M Valentijn; Tom Teerlink; Bengt Lindholm; Piet M Ter Wee; Casper G Schalkwijk
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  American Society of Nephrology Quiz and Questionnaire 2014: RRT.

Authors:  Rajnish Mehrotra; Mark A Perazella; Michael J Choi
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 3.  Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis: the state of affairs.

Authors:  Mario R Korte; Denise E Sampimon; Michiel G H Betjes; Raymond T Krediet
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 28.314

4.  Eosinophilia in a peritoneal dialysis patient: Answers.

Authors:  Shimrit Tzvi-Behr; Yaacov Frishberg; Efrat Ben-Shalom; Choni Rinat; Rachel Becker-Cohen
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 3.714

5.  Solutions for peritoneal dialysis in children: recommendations by the European Pediatric Dialysis Working Group.

Authors:  Claus Peter Schmitt; Sevcan A Bakkaloglu; Günter Klaus; Cornelis Schröder; Michel Fischbach
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 3.714

6.  A peritoneal dialysis regimen low in glucose and glucose degradation products results in increased cancer antigen 125 and peritoneal activation.

Authors:  Caatje Y le Poole; Angelique G A Welten; Piet M ter Wee; Nanne J Paauw; Amina N Djorai; Rob M Valentijn; Robert H J Beelen; Jacob van den Born; Frans J van Ittersum
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 1.756

7.  Use of pharmacokinetic/ pharmacodynamic modelling for starting dose selection in first-in-human trials of high-risk biologics.

Authors:  Balaji M Agoram
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  Comparison of the immunostimulatory and proinflammatory activities of candidate Gram-positive endotoxins, lipoteichoic acid, peptidoglycan, and lipopeptides, in murine and human cells.

Authors:  Matthew R Kimbrell; Hemamali Warshakoon; Jens R Cromer; Subbalakshmi Malladi; Jennifer D Hood; Rajalakshmi Balakrishna; Tandace A Scholdberg; Sunil A David
Journal:  Immunol Lett       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 3.685

Review 9.  Prevention of membrane damage in patient on peritoneal dialysis with new peritoneal dialysis solutions.

Authors:  Mufazzal Ahmad; Hemal Shah; Theodori Pliakogiannis; Dimitrios G Oreopoulos
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 2.266

Review 10.  Dialysis-associated peritonitis in children.

Authors:  Vimal Chadha; Franz S Schaefer; Bradley A Warady
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 3.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.