Literature DB >> 15707566

The duration of use, causes of discontinuation, and problems during removal in women admitted for removal of IUD.

Semih Tugrul1, Bekir Yavuzer, Gazi Yildirim, Arif Kayahan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine the duration of intrauterine device (IUD) use, reasons for discontinuation, and problems encountered during removal in patients who were admitted to our clinic for removal of IUD.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 321 cases of IUD removal with respect to duration of use, cause of removal, type of IUD used, and sociodemographic characteristics. The relationships among duration of use, patient's level of education, medical facility where the IUD was inserted, and number of children were analyzed. The reasons for removal and their relationship to duration of use were investigated. We also investigated the problems encountered during removal.
FINDINGS: The mean age of cases included in the study was 34.8+/-1 years, mean number of children was 2.3+/-1.5, and mean duration of use was 5.8+/-3.9 years. The type of IUD most frequently removed was TCu-380A (86.3%). Although there was no correlation between the duration of use and the type of medical facility where the IUD was inserted, we observed that women with more children used IUDs for longer periods. When cases were evaluated for level of education, there was a statistically significant difference between university graduates and illiterate/primary school graduate women (p = .032 and .029, respectively). The reasons for removal were frequently side effects related to IUD use, expired date of use, and desire for conception. Pregnancy during IUD use was observed in 16 cases (5%). Removal of IUD was achieved without problems in 263 cases (81.9%), whereas alligator forceps needed to be used in 44 cases (13.7%).
CONCLUSION: IUD is the most frequently used contraceptive method in our country. We have observed a long duration of use in the women studied, with minimal problems during removal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15707566     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2004.08.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  5 in total

1.  Malpositioned IUCD: the menace of postpartum IUCD insertion.

Authors:  Aruna Nigam; Ayesha Ahmad; Neha Gupta; Archana Kumari
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-08-19

2.  In-office retrieval of intrauterine contraceptive devices with missing strings.

Authors:  Sujatha Prabhakaran; Alice Chuang
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Effectiveness of Manual Vacuum Aspiration (MVA) Device in the Management of Intrauterine Copper Devices (IUCD) with Missing Strings: A Prospective Interventional Study.

Authors:  Ankita Jain; Sarita Singh; Sabeena Elliyas
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2021-03-15

4.  Incidentally Diagnosed Type 2 Youssef's Syndrome with Migrated Postcesarean Postpartum Intrauterine Contraceptive Device.

Authors:  Vibha Mishra; Himanshu Pandey; Shashank Shekhar; Charu Sharma
Journal:  Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther       Date:  2022-02-14

5.  Hysteroscopic-guided Removal of Retained Intrauterine Device: Experience at an Academic Tertiary Hospital.

Authors:  Ma Rosielyn D Asto; Maria Antonia E Habana
Journal:  Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther       Date:  2018-05-02
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.