Literature DB >> 15707565

Patient preference in a randomized study comparing medical and surgical abortion at 10-13 weeks gestation.

Premila W Ashok1, Haitham Hamoda, Gillian M M Flett, Avril Kidd, Ann Fitzmaurice, Allan Templeton.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess women's preferences and acceptability of medical (MA) and surgical abortion (SA) at 10-13 weeks gestation. This was a partially randomized patient preference trial. Women were offered to enter the randomized arm of the trial. Those who expressed a strong preference for a method were entered into the preference arm. A total of 368 women were randomized (188 medical and 180 surgical) while 77 entered the preference arm (15 medical and 62 surgical). Prior to abortion, 253 women (72%) indicated a preference for MA while 98 (28%) showed a preference for surgery (p < .0001). Despite having a preference for a particular method, women were content with alternatives. Women were more likely to choose the same abortion method again if they had shown a preference for that method prior to abortion (p = .002 and .01 for MA and SA, respectively). The availability of MA is an important option for many women who wish to avoid surgery or anesthesia and should now be offered routinely in the late first trimester.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15707565     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2004.08.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  4 in total

1.  Self-selection vs Randomized Assignment of Treatment for Appendicitis.

Authors:  Giana H Davidson; Sarah E Monsell; Heather Evans; Emily C Voldal; Erin Fannon; Sarah O Lawrence; Anusha Krishnadasan; David A Talan; Bonnie Bizzell; Patrick J Heagerty; Bryan A Comstock; Danielle C Lavallee; Cassandra Villegas; Robert Winchell; Callie M Thompson; Wesley H Self; Lillian S Kao; Shah-Jahan Dodwad; Amber K Sabbatini; David Droullard; David Machado-Aranda; Melinda Maggard Gibbons; Amy H Kaji; Daniel A DeUgarte; Lisa Ferrigno; Matthew Salzberg; Katherine A Mandell; Nicole Siparsky; Thea P Price; Anooradha Raman; Joshua Corsa; Jon Wisler; Patricia Ayoung-Chee; Jesse Victory; Alan Jones; Matthew Kutcher; Karen McGrane; Julie Holihan; Mike K Liang; Joseph Cuschieri; Jeffrey Johnson; Katherine Fischkoff; F Thurston Drake; Sabrina E Sanchez; Stephen R Odom; Larry G Kessler; David R Flum
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 16.681

2.  Partially randomised patient preference trials as an alternative design to randomised controlled trials: systematic review and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Karin A Wasmann; Pieta Wijsman; Susan van Dieren; Willem Bemelman; Christianne Buskens
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 3.  Experiences of abortion: a narrative review of qualitative studies.

Authors:  Mabel L S Lie; Stephen C Robson; Carl R May
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  A Retrospective Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Mifepristone-Misoprostol Medical Abortions in the First Year at the Regina General Hospital.

Authors:  Caitlin Hunter; Joshua Jensen; Biaka Imeah; Michelle McCarron; Megan Clark
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2020-08-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.