| Literature DB >> 15707411 |
Mureo Kasahara1, Yasutsugu Takada, Hiroto Egawa, Yasuhiro Fujimoto, Yasuhiro Ogura, Kohei Ogawa, Koichi Kozaki, Hironori Haga, Mikiko Ueda, Koichi Tanaka.
Abstract
Auxiliary partial orthotopic liver transplantation (APOLT) was initially indicated as a potentially reversible fulminant hepatic failure and non-cirrhotic metabolic liver disease to compensate for enzyme deficiency without complete removal of the native liver. We expand our indication of APOLT for small-for-size grafts to support the function of implanted grafts during the early post-operative period, and for ABO-incompatibility to sustain a patient's life if the patient has a graft failure. We retrospectively reviewed 31 patients undergoing APOLT from living donor. The indication of APOLT was fulminant hepatic failure in 6, non-cirrhotic metabolic liver disease in 6, small-for-size grafts in 13 and ABO-incompatible cases in 6. The cumulative survival rate for APOLT at 1 and 5 years was 57.9% and 50.6%, and 78.8% and 73.8% for standard LDLT. None of the patients who underwent transplantation with APOLT for fulminant hepatic failure had long-term patient survival. The incidence of acute cellular rejection was higher in APOLT (58.1%) than standard LDLT (35.0%). Biliary complication was higher and the need for retransplantation was greater in APOLT than standard LDLT (p < 0.01). The results suggest that the indications of APOLT should be reconsidered in view of the risk for complications and retransplantation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2005 PMID: 15707411 DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.00717.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Transplant ISSN: 1600-6135 Impact factor: 8.086