Literature DB >> 15707289

The relative attractiveness of carbon dioxide and octenol in CDC- and EVS-type light traps for sampling the mosquitoes Aedes aegypti (L.), Aedes polynesiensis Marks, and Culex quinquefasciatus say in Moorea, French Polynesia.

Richard C Russell1.   

Abstract

Two dominant day-biting pests and vector species on the island of Moorea in French Polynesia are Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti (L.) and Aedes (Stegomyia) polynesiensis Marks, major vectors of dengue viruses and Wuchereria bancrofti, respectively. Their surveillance is hindered by a relative lack of attraction to light traps, necessitating the undesirable use of human bait collections with the inherent risks of pathogen transmission. The effectiveness of CDC- and EVS-type light traps baited with olfactory attractants was evaluated for these two Aedes species and the nocturnal Culex (Culex) quinquefasciatus Say in three sites in urban and semi-rural environments on Moorea in October/November 2003. Firstly, four CDC-type traps with light only, light with octenol, light with carbon dioxide (dry ice), and light with octenol plus carbon dioxide were operated continuously over four days with daily rotation to compensate for position effects. Secondly, two CDC- and two EVS-type traps with carbon dioxide or carbon dioxide plus octenol were operated continuously over four days with similar rotation. Variation was found in the numbers of the three species collected at the different sites, reflecting the relative availability of their preferred larval habitats. With the CDC traps in the first trial, the addition of octenol to the light did not significantly increase the collection of any species, the addition of carbon dioxide did significantly increase collection of all three species, while the addition of octenol to the light plus carbon dioxide did not significantly increase the collections further. In the second trial, there was no significant difference in the mean number of Ae. aegypti or Ae. polynesiensis collected in either EVS or CDC traps when baited with carbon dioxide or with octenol added. For Cx. quinquefasciatus, the supplementation with octenol made no significant difference with EVS traps but resulted in significantly reduced collections in CDC traps. Overall, neither trap, however baited, provided large samples when compared with landing/ biting collections at human bait. Only two other species were collected, Culex (Culex) roseni Belkin and Aedes (Aedimorphus) nocturnus (Theobald), the latter being a first record for the island of Moorea and for French Polynesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15707289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vector Ecol        ISSN: 1081-1710            Impact factor:   1.671


  14 in total

1.  Monitoring temporal abundance and spatial distribution of Aedes polynesiensis using BG-Sentinel traps in neighboring habitats on Raiatea, Society Archipelago, French Polynesia.

Authors:  David R Mercer; Herve Bossin; Michel Cheong Sang; Linda O'Connor; Stephen L Dobson
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.278

2.  Field evaluation of the efficacy of proprietary repellent formulations with IR3535 and picaridin against Aedes aegypti.

Authors:  T J Naucke; R Kröpke; G Benner; J Schulz; K P Wittern; A Rose; U Kröckel; H W Grünewald
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 2.289

Review 3.  Mosquito Attractants.

Authors:  Laurent Dormont; Margaux Mulatier; David Carrasco; Anna Cohuet
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  An improved trap to capture adult container-inhabiting mosquitoes.

Authors:  Roberto Barrera; Andrew J Mackay; Manuel Amador
Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 0.917

5.  The impact of CO2 on collection of Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus) and Culex quinquefasciatus Say by BG-Sentinel® traps in Manaus, Brazil.

Authors:  Tatiana Mingote Ferreira de Ázara; Carolin Marlen Degener; Rosemary Aparecida Roque; Jörg Johannes Ohly; Martin Geier; Álvaro Eduardo Eiras
Journal:  Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.743

6.  Mosquito host preferences affect their response to synthetic and natural odour blends.

Authors:  Annette O Busula; Willem Takken; Dorothy E Loy; Beatrice H Hahn; Wolfgang R Mukabana; Niels O Verhulst
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 2.979

7.  Evaluation of traps and lures for mosquito vectors and xenomonitoring of Wuchereria bancrofti infection in a high prevalence Samoan Village.

Authors:  Limb K Hapairai; Catherine Plichart; Take Naseri; Ualesi Silva; Lameko Tesimale; Paulo Pemita; Hervé C Bossin; Thomas R Burkot; Scott A Ritchie; Patricia M Graves; Wayne Melrose; Hayley Joseph
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 3.876

8.  Ecological niche modeling of Aedes mosquito vectors of chikungunya virus in southeastern Senegal.

Authors:  Rebecca Richman; Diawo Diallo; Mawlouth Diallo; Amadou A Sall; Oumar Faye; Cheikh T Diagne; Ibrahima Dia; Scott C Weaver; Kathryn A Hanley; Michaela Buenemann
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 3.876

9.  Assessing entomological risk factors for arboviral disease transmission in the French Territory of the Wallis and Futuna Islands.

Authors:  Elodie Calvez; Nicolas Pocquet; Atoloto Malau; Sosiasi Kilama; Alefosio Taugamoa; Didier Labrousse; Philippe Boussès; Anna-Bella Failloux; Myrielle Dupont-Rouzeyrol; Françoise Mathieu-Daudé
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2020-05-13

10.  Evaluation of CDC light traps for mosquito surveillance in a malaria endemic area on the Thai-Myanmar border.

Authors:  Patchara Sriwichai; Stephan Karl; Yudthana Samung; Suchada Sumruayphol; Kirakorn Kiattibutr; Anon Payakkapol; Ivo Mueller; Guiyun Yan; Liwang Cui; Jetsumon Sattabongkot
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 3.876

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.