Literature DB >> 15707042

Monitoring mercury in the loggerhead sea turtle, Caretta caretta.

Rusty D Day1, Steven J Christopher, Paul R Becker, David W Whitaker.   

Abstract

The validity of using blood samples and keratinized scutes for nonlethal routine monitoring of mercury (Hg) in loggerhead sea turtles, Caretta caretta, is evaluated in the context of how effectively these matrixes predict internal tissue Hg burdens and the different temporal scales of exposure they represent. Total Hg (THg) was measured in blood and scutes collected from live captures (n = 34) and liver, kidney, muscle, spinal cord, blood, and scutes collected from freshly stranded loggerhead turtles (n = 6) along the coast of the southeastern United States. Linear regressions between monitoring compartments and internal tissues from stranded animals were all statistically significant (r2 > 0.805, p < 0.015) but varied in their utility as a predictive tool depending on which tissues were paired. Blood was an effective predictor of THg in muscle (r2 = 0.988, p < 0.0001) and spinal cord (r2 = 0.988, p < 0.0001), while scute was the most accurate predictor of THg in liver (r2 = 0.948, p = 0.0010). The strength of the relationship between tissues types is believed to reflect the similarity in the temporal scales they represent and the variability in the fraction of methylmercury present. The stability of Hg in the scute matrix makes this tissue preferable for approximating long-term exposure, while blood Hg levels can be affected by recent changes in Hg intake. THg levels in blood and scutes from live captures were highly correlated (linear regression r2 = 0.926, p < 0.0001) and increased significantly with body mass (r2 = 0.173, p = 0.016 and r2 = 0.187, p = 0.012 respectively), further supporting thatthere is a component reflecting long-term accumulation of Hg in these matrixes. We also present a novel technique using the residuals from the blood-scute regression as an index of recent exposure (IRE). The interpretation of this value is derived from the comparison between the most recent Hg intake (which contributes to the Hg measured in the blood) relative to the average past intake (which is recorded in the scute). A stepwise multiple regression revealed a significant positive relationship between the IRE and the proximity of the capture site to the nearest major industrial river mouth (p = 0.0102). This suggests that there is an elevation of bioavailable Hg in nearshore habitats where terrestrial influences and anthropogenic impacts are high. Seasonal foraging site fidelity and the variability in environmental Hg may explain the high intraspecific variability and occasional highly contaminated turtle seen in this and previous studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15707042     DOI: 10.1021/es049628q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  12 in total

Review 1.  Radionuclide transfer to reptiles.

Authors:  Michael D Wood; Nicholas A Beresford; Dmitry V Semenov; Tamara L Yankovich; David Copplestone
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Use of toe clips as a nonlethal index of mercury accumulation and maternal transfer in amphibians.

Authors:  Brian D Todd; Christine M Bergeron; William A Hopkins
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  A comparative study of inorganic elements in the blood of male and female Caspian pond turtles (Mauremys caspica) from the southern basin of the Caspian Sea.

Authors:  Milad Adel; Adriana A Cortés-Gómez; Maryam Dadar; Hossein Riyahi; Marc Girondot
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-09-16       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Nondestructive indices of mercury exposure in three species of turtles occupying different trophic niches downstream from a former chloralkali facility.

Authors:  William A Hopkins; Cathy Bodinof; Sarah Budischak; Christopher Perkins
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Trace metals in green sea turtles (Chelonia mydas) inhabiting two southern California coastal estuaries.

Authors:  Arthur D Barraza; Lisa M Komoroske; Camryn Allen; Tomoharu Eguchi; Rich Gossett; Erika Holland; Daniel D Lawson; Robin A LeRoux; Alex Long; Jeffrey A Seminoff; Christopher G Lowe
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 7.086

6.  Associations between trace elements and clinical health parameters in the North Pacific loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta) from Baja California Sur, Mexico.

Authors:  César Paúl Ley-Quiñónez; Natalia Alejandra Rossi-Lafferriere; Teresa Leticia Espinoza-Carreon; Catherine Edwina Hart; Sherwood Hoyt Peckham; Alfredo Alonso Aguirre; Alan Alfredo Zavala-Norzagaray
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-02-25       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, and selenium levels in blood of four species of turtles from the Amazon in Brazil.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; Christian Jeitner; Larissa Schneider; Richard Vogt; Michael Gochfeld
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2010

8.  European pond turtle (Emys orbicularis persica) as a biomarker of environmental pollution in Golestan and Mazandaran provinces, Iran.

Authors:  Somayeh Namroodi; Annalisa Zaccaroni; Hassan Rezaei; Seyyedeh Malihe Hosseini
Journal:  Vet Res Forum       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 1.054

9.  Relationship of blood mercury levels to health parameters in the loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta).

Authors:  Rusty D Day; Al L Segars; Michael D Arendt; A Michelle Lee; Margie M Peden-Adams
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Trace Element Concentrations in Blood and Scute Tissues from Wild and Captive Hawaiian Green Sea Turtles (Chelonia mydas).

Authors:  Katherine R Shaw; Jennifer M Lynch; George H Balazs; T Todd Jones; Jeff Pawloski; Marc R Rice; Amanda D French; Jing Liu; George P Cobb; David M Klein
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 4.218

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.