S G Scheib1, S Gianolini, N J Lomax, A Mack. 1. Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Klinik Im Park, Zurich, Switzerland. stefan.scheib@hirslanden.ch
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A high degree of precision and accuracy in radiosurgery is a fundamental requirement for therapeutic success. Small radiation fields and steep dose gradients are clinically applied thus necessitating a dedicated quality assurance program in order to guarantee dosimetric and geometric accuracy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A detailed analysis of the course of treatment independent of the irradiation technique used results in the so-called chain of uncertainties in radiosurgery (immobilisation, imaging, treatment planning system, definition of regions of interest, mechanical accuracy, dose planning, dose verification). Each link in this chain is analysed for accuracy and the established quality assurance procedures are discussed. A "System Test" was used to check the whole chain of uncertainties simultaneously. RESULTS: The tests described are compatible with published reports on quality assurance in radiosurgery. In terms of accuracy the weakest link in the chain of uncertainties is stereotactic MR imaging. Geometric overall accuracy measured in the "System Test" is less than 0.7 mm. CONCLUSION: The established quality assurance routines have clinically been validated. MR imaging dominates geometric overall accuracy in radiosurgery, which can be limited to less than 1 mm by an adequate quality assurance protocol.
BACKGROUND: A high degree of precision and accuracy in radiosurgery is a fundamental requirement for therapeutic success. Small radiation fields and steep dose gradients are clinically applied thus necessitating a dedicated quality assurance program in order to guarantee dosimetric and geometric accuracy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A detailed analysis of the course of treatment independent of the irradiation technique used results in the so-called chain of uncertainties in radiosurgery (immobilisation, imaging, treatment planning system, definition of regions of interest, mechanical accuracy, dose planning, dose verification). Each link in this chain is analysed for accuracy and the established quality assurance procedures are discussed. A "System Test" was used to check the whole chain of uncertainties simultaneously. RESULTS: The tests described are compatible with published reports on quality assurance in radiosurgery. In terms of accuracy the weakest link in the chain of uncertainties is stereotactic MR imaging. Geometric overall accuracy measured in the "System Test" is less than 0.7 mm. CONCLUSION: The established quality assurance routines have clinically been validated. MR imaging dominates geometric overall accuracy in radiosurgery, which can be limited to less than 1 mm by an adequate quality assurance protocol.
Authors: Steven K Seung; David A Larson; James M Galvin; Minesh P Mehta; Louis Potters; Christopher J Schultz; Santosh V Yajnik; Alan C Hartford; Seth A Rosenthal Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 2.339