Literature DB >> 15706554

Complications and side effects of cervical and lumbosacral selective nerve root injections.

Christopher W Huston1, Curtis W Slipman, Cyndi Garvin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of complications and side effects of cervical and lumbosacral selective nerve root injections (SNRIs).
DESIGN: Prospective, nonrandomized controlled trial of consecutive patients with independent interviews for immediate, 1-week, and 3-month follow-ups.
SETTING: Tertiary, academic spine center. PARTICIPANTS: Of 160 patients eligible for SNRI, 151 underwent 306 SNRIs (study group). Sixty patients who had not undergone any intervention served as the control group.
INTERVENTIONS: Diagnostic and therapeutic fluoroscopically guided cervical and lumbosacral SNRIs. Lidocaine (Xylocaine) was used in the diagnostic injections and a mixture of lidocaine and betamethasone was used in the therapeutic injections. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Complications and side effects experienced during the procedure were recorded by the interventionalist. Side effects and complications experienced immediately, 1 week, and 3 months after injection were determined through independent interviews using a questionnaire format. The control group was independently interviewed using the same questionnaire.
RESULTS: There were no major complications, such as death, paralysis, spinal nerve injury, infection, or allergic reaction, during the study. Ninety-one percent of subjects had no side effects during the procedure. A positive response on interview was reported by 39.4% of the study subjects immediately after the procedure. Lumbosacral SNRI side effects were as follows: increased pain at the injection site (17.1%); increased radicular pain (8.8%); lightheadedness (6.5%); increased spine pain (5.1%); nausea (3.7%); nonspecific headache (1.4%); and vomiting (0.5%). Immediate side effects from cervical SNRI were as follows: increased pain at injection site (22.7%); increased radicular pain (18.2%); lightheadedness (13.6%); increased spine pain (9.1%); nonspecific headache (4.5%); and nausea (3.4%). At the 1-week interview, comparison of the study and control groups showed statistical significance for the following: pain at injection site, cervical ( P =.001) and lumbar ( P =.005); nonspecific headache, cervical ( P =.019); and nonspinal headache, cervical ( P =.002). At 3 months, 2 subjects complained of increased neck pain and 1 reported heartburn and fluid retention. Two lumbar SNRI subjects were lost to follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: There were no major complications with cervical and lumbosacral SNRIs, although various minor side effects occurred.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15706554     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.02.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  19 in total

1.  [Injection therapy of cervical spine syndromes].

Authors:  J Grifka; D Boluki
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  [Injection therapy for cervical and lumbar syndromes].

Authors:  J Grifka; A Benditz; D Boluki
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Vasovagal rates in flouroscopically guided interventional procedures: a study of over 8,000 injections.

Authors:  David J Kennedy; Byron Schneider; Ellen Casey; Joshua Rittenberg; Bryan Conrad; Matthew Smuck; Christopher T Plastaras
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 3.750

4.  CT Fluoroscopy-Guided Blood Patching of Ventral CSF Leaks by Direct Needle Placement in the Ventral Epidural Space Using a Transforaminal Approach.

Authors:  T J Amrhein; N T Befera; L Gray; P G Kranz
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  [The application of different injection methods for cervical and lumbar syndromes].

Authors:  F Faber; A Benditz; D Boluki; J Grifka
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.107

6.  Complications and pitfalls of lumbar interlaminar and transforaminal epidural injections.

Authors:  Bradly S Goodman; Lyle W F Posecion; Srinivas Mallempati; Matt Bayazitoglu
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2008-08-15

7.  Transforaminal epidural steroid injections prevent the need for surgery in patients with sciatica secondary to lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective case series.

Authors:  Neil A Manson; Melissa D McKeon; Edward P Abraham
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  Selective cervical nerve root blockade: experience with a safe and reliable technique using an anterolateral approach for needle placement.

Authors:  K P Schellhas; S R Pollei; B A Johnson; M J Golden; J A Eklund; R S Pobiel
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-09-28       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Selective cervical nerve root blockade: prospective study of immediate and longer term complications.

Authors:  R S Pobiel; K P Schellhas; J A Eklund; M J Golden; B A Johnson; S Chopra; P Broadbent; M E Myers; K Shrack
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  The Efficacy and Persistence of Selective Nerve Root Block under Fluoroscopic Guidance for Cervical Radiculopathy.

Authors:  Jae-Yoon Chung; Ji-Hyeon Yim; Hyoung-Yeon Seo; Sung-Kyu Kim; Kyu-Jin Cho
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2012-12-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.