Literature DB >> 15706345

Does gender affect outcome of surgery in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?

Ilkka Helenius1, Ville Remes, Timo Yrjönen, Mauno Ylikoski, Dietrich Schlenzka, Miia Helenius, Mikko Poussa.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective follow-up study comparing 2 matched groups.
OBJECTIVE: To compare long-term results of operative treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) between males and females matched for age, curve magnitude and type, and the instrumentation used. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: It has been suggested that in AIS, the spine is more rigid in males than in females, because brace treatment fails to halt progression of the curves in males. However, there are no studies comparing the results of surgical treatment of AIS between males and females.
METHODS: Thirty male and female pairs were matched for age (+/-1 year), major curve magnitude (+/-5 degrees), curve type according to the King classification, and the instrumentation used (Harrington in 11 pairs, Cotrel-Dubousset in 9 pairs, and Universal Spine System in 10 pairs). The mean age at the time of operation was 16.2 +/- 2.6 years for the males and 15.5 +/- 2.3 years for the females. The mean follow-up times were 14.3 years (range 6.7-23.0 years) and 14.1 year (range 6.4-23.7 years), respectively. Radiographs were obtained presurgery and after surgery, at the 2-year follow-up assessment, and at the final follow-up visit. In addition, a physical examination was performed, and the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) questionnaire was completed. Spine mobility and nondynamometric trunk strength were measured at the final follow-up visit.
RESULTS: Before surgery, the mean Cobb angle of the thoracic curve was 55 degrees (range 42-83 degrees) in the males and 56 degrees (range 43-80 degrees) in the females. In bending radiographs, the major curve reduced significantly more in females than in males (P = 0.027). The mean angles of the thoracic and lumbar curves were similar at all follow-up visits. The final correction of the thoracic curves was 30% (range -19-65%) in the males and 33% (range -7-71%) in the females (not significant). No significant difference was observed in thoracic kyphosis or lumbar lordosis between the study groups at the final follow-up. The total SRS questionnaire score averaged 96 (range 66-113) in the males and 95 (range 75-108) in the females. None of the males and 2 of the females reported back pain often or very often in the questionnaire. Nondynamometric trunk strength measurements corresponded with reference values, on average, and were similar in both groups. Abnormal trunk side bending tended to be more common in the males than in the females (43% vs. 23%, P = 0.10, not significant).
CONCLUSIONS: Curves in males appear to be more rigid than in females with AIS. However, posterior surgery for AIS provides similar short and long-term results in males and females.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15706345     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000153347.11559.de

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  11 in total

Review 1.  Bracing in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Dietrich Schlenzka; Timo Yrjönen
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 1.548

2.  Risk of revision surgery for adult idiopathic scoliosis: a survival analysis of 517 cases over 25 years.

Authors:  Guillaume Riouallon; Benjamin Bouyer; Stéphane Wolff
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Results of brace treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in boys compared with girls: a retrospective study of 102 patients treated with the Boston brace.

Authors:  Timo Yrjönen; Mauno Ylikoski; Dietrich Schlenzka; Mikko Poussa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Health-related quality of life in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after treatment: short-term effects after brace or surgical treatment.

Authors:  Eveline M Bunge; Rikard E Juttmann; Marinus de Kleuver; Frans C van Biezen; Harry J de Koning
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-04-12       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Surgical correction of spinal deformities after solid organ transplantation in childhood.

Authors:  Jari Peltonen; Ville Remes; Christer Holmberg; Hannu Jalanko; Ilkka Helenius
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-01-10       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Males with familial idiopathic scoliosis: a distinct phenotypic subgroup.

Authors:  Mark Clough; Cristina M Justice; Beth Marosy; Nancy H Miller
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Effects of living environment on the postoperative Scoliosis Research Society-24 results in females with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Ewa Misterska; Maciej Głowacki; Sławomir Panek; Anna Ignyś-O'Byrne; Jakub Głowacki; Iwona Ignyś; Hanna Krauss; Jacek Piątek
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2012-08

8.  Radiographic outcome of surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in males versus females.

Authors:  Ebrahim Ameri; Hamid Behtash; Bahram Mobini; Farzad Omidi-Kashani; Behnam Momeni
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2008-09-06

9.  Comparison of Radiographic Postoperative Outcomes Between Males and Females With AIS.

Authors:  Ximing Xu; Fei Wang; Xiaoyi Zhou; Yajun Cheng; Xianzhao Wei; Yushu Bai; Ming Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  Mental health of adults treated in adolescence with scoliosis-specific exercise program or observed for idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Maciej Płaszewski; Igor Cieśliński; Roman Nowobilski; Tomasz Kotwicki; Jacek Terech; Mariusz Furgał
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-01-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.