Literature DB >> 15705369

A randomized prospective trial comparing gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist/recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) versus GnRH-agonist/rFSH in women pretreated with oral contraceptives before in vitro fertilization.

Larry I Barmat1, Samuel J Chantilis, Bradley S Hurst, Richard P Dickey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of oral contraceptive (OC) pill pretreatment in recombinant FSH/GnRH-antagonist versus recombinant FSH/GnRH-agonist stimulation in in vitro fertilization (IVF) patients, and to evaluate optimization of retrieval day.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, multicenter study.
SETTING: Private practice and university centers. PATIENT(S): Eighty patients undergoing IVF who met the appropriate inclusion criteria. INTERVENTION(S): Four study centers recruited 80 patients. The OC regimen began on cycle days 2 to 4 and was discontinued on a Sunday after 14 to 28 days. The recombinant FSH regimen was begun on the following Friday. The GnRH-agonist group was treated with a long protocol; the GnRH-antagonist was initiated when the lead follicle reached 12 to 14 mm. When two follicles had reached 16 to 18 mm, hCG was administered. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary outcome measures were the number of cumulus-oocyte complexes, day of the week for oocyte retrieval, and total dose and days of stimulation of recombinant FSH. Secondary efficacy variables included pregnancy and implantation rate; serum E(2) levels on stimulation day 1; serum E(2), P, and LH levels on the day of hCG administration; follicle size on day 6 and day of hCG administration; the total days of GnRH-analogue treatment; total days on OC; total days from end of OC to oocyte retrieval; and the cycle cancellation rate. RESULT(S): Patient outcomes were similar for the days of stimulation, total dose of gonadotropin used, two-pronuclei embryos, pregnancy (44.4% GnRH-antagonist vs. 45.0% GnRH-agonist, P=.86) and implantation rates (22.2% GnRH-antagonist vs. 26.4% GnRH-agonist, P=.71). Oral contraceptive cycle scheduling resulted in 78% and 90% of retrievals performed Monday through Friday for GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist. A one day delay in OC discontinuation and recombinant FSH start would result in over 90% of oocyte retrievals occurring Monday through Friday in both groups. CONCLUSION(S): The OC pretreatment in recombinant FSH/GnRH-antagonist protocols provides a patient-friendly regimen and can be optimized for weekday retrievals. No difference was seen in number of 2PN embryos, cryopreserved embryos, embryos transferred, implantation and pregnancy rates between the two stimulation protocols.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15705369     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.06.076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  14 in total

1.  Influence of pituitary suppression with triphasic or monophasic oral contraceptives on the outcome of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer.

Authors:  Ming-Ting Chung; Yung-Chieh Tsai; Sheng-Hsien Chen; Tao-Chuan Loo; Hsun-Han Tang; Liang-Yin Lin
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2006-08-16       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Precycle Estradiol in Synchronization and Scheduling of Antagonist Cycles.

Authors:  Shilpa Saple; Mukesh Agrawal; Simi Kawar
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2016-04-29

3.  Defining ovarian reserve to better understand ovarian aging.

Authors:  Norbert Gleicher; Andrea Weghofer; David H Barad
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 5.211

4.  The effect of oral contraceptive pill for cycle scheduling prior to GnRH-antagonist protocol on IVF cycle parameters and pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  Haim Pinkas; Onit Sapir; Ori M Avrech; Avi Ben-Haroush; Jacob Ashkenzi; Benjamin Fisch; Jacob Farhi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-01-19       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  GnRH antagonist multiple dose protocol with oral contraceptive pill pretreatment in poor responders undergoing IVF/ICSI.

Authors:  Chung-Hoon Kim; Rae-Mi You; Hyuk-Jae Kang; Jun-Woo Ahn; Ilkyung Jeon; Ji-Won Lee; Sung-Hoon Kim; Hee-Dong Chae; Byung-Moon Kang
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2011-12-31

6.  Cycle scheduling for in vitro fertilization with oral contraceptive pills versus oral estradiol valerate: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Erik E Hauzman; Azucena Zapata; Alfonso Bermejo; Carlos Iglesias; Antonio Pellicer; Juan A Garcia-Velasco
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2013-09-28       Impact factor: 5.211

Review 7.  Optimal usage of the GnRH antagonists: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Alan B Copperman; Claudio Benadiva
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 5.211

8.  Impact of GnRH ovarian stimulation protocols on intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes.

Authors:  Fátima Pinto; Cristiano Oliveira; Margarida F Cardoso; José Teixeira-da-Silva; Joaquina Silva; Mário Sousa; Alberto Barros
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 5.211

9.  Comparisons of GnRH antagonist versus GnRH agonist protocol in supposed normal ovarian responders undergoing IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jin-song Xiao; Cun-mei Su; Xian-tao Zeng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Comparisons of GnRH antagonist protocol versus GnRH agonist long protocol in patients with normal ovarian reserve: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ruolin Wang; Shouren Lin; Yong Wang; Weiping Qian; Liang Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.