Literature DB >> 15705367

Evaluation of two doses of recombinant luteinizing hormone supplementation in an unselected group of women undergoing follicular stimulation for in vitro fertilization.

Franco Lisi1, Leonardo Rinaldi, Simon Fishel, Donatella Caserta, Rosella Lisi, Alison Campbell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of two doses of recombinant (r)LH, 75 IU (recommended) or 37.5 IU, for follicular stimulation and outcomes in a randomized cohort of IVF patients.
DESIGN: Randomized, prospective analysis.
SETTING: Private hospital incorporating an established IVF center. PATIENT(S): Women undergoing IVF who had a body mass index >18 or <35 and no abnormal karyotype, anovulation, oligomenorrhea, or any known endocrinopathy/illness. INTERVENTION(S): Pituitary desensitization was achieved with triptorelin (0.1 mg SC), and gonadotropin stimulation was performed with either rFSH alone (group A) or in combination with rLH in one of two doses: 37.5 IU (group B) or 75 IU (group C), daily. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): A range of endocrinologic, embryologic, clinical, and outcome parameters were evaluated. RESULT(S): With rLH supplementation there was a significant increase in the incidence of implantation (9% for rFSH only [group A] vs. 11% and 16% with 37.5 IU rLH and 75.0 IU rLH [groups B and C], respectively) and clinical pregnancy (19% vs. 23% and 31%) (P<.01 and P<.04, respectively), whereas there was no difference in the multiple pregnancy rates. There was a significant (P<.001) increase in the total units of rFSH used in proportion to the amount of rLH supplementation (2,645 U vs. 3,475 U and 3,681 U) and in the level of peripheral E(2) on the day of hCG administration (1,049 pg/mL vs. 1,640 pg/mL and 1,226 pg/mL) (P<.001). There was no significant between difference in mean age, numbers of oocytes recovered, basal and downregulation hormone levels, or the incidence of fertilization in the absence or presence of rLH supplementation, but a higher incidence of grade 1 to 2 embryos was observed when rLH was supplemented. CONCLUSION(S): After pituitary desensitization, there was an increase in the incidence of implantation, clinical pregnancy, and delivery rates in patients stimulated with rFSH supplemented with rLH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15705367     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.07.969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  14 in total

Review 1.  The curious case of premature luteinization.

Authors:  Apostolos Kaponis; Elpiniki Chronopoulou; George Decavalas
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Discontinuation of rLH two days before hCG may increase the number of oocytes retrieved in IVF.

Authors:  Jessica B Spencer; Aimee S Browne; Susannah D Copland; Donna R Session
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 5.211

Review 3.  Lutropin alfa.

Authors:  Sohita Dhillon; Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Follicular fluid hormonal profile and cumulus cell gene expression in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with recombinant FSH: effects of recombinant LH administration.

Authors:  Marzia Barberi; Beatrice Ermini; Maria Beatrice Morelli; Michele Ermini; Sandra Cecconi; Rita Canipari
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Clinical outcomes following long GnRHa ovarian stimulation with highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin plus rFSH or rFSH in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: a multi-center randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Li Shu; Qianhua Xu; Qingxia Meng; Xue Dai; Yun Zhang; Wei Zhou; Honggang Yi; Jinyong Liu; Chunxiang Wu; Zhen Hou; Yugui Cui; Tin Chiu Li; Jiayin Liu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-04

6.  Exogenous hCG activity, but not endogenous LH activity, is positively associated with live birth rates in anovulatory infertility.

Authors:  Joan-Carles Arce; Johan Smitz
Journal:  Hum Fertil (Camb)       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 2.767

7.  Results from adding recombinant LH for assisted reproductive technology treatment: A randomized control trial.

Authors:  Mohammad-Hossein Razi; Fereshteh Mohseni; Razieh Dehghani Firouzabadi; Sima Janati; Nahid Yari; Sahabeh Etebary
Journal:  Iran J Reprod Med       Date:  2014-02

8.  Recombinant luteinizing hormone supplementation in women undergoing in vitro fertilization/ intracytoplasmic sperm injection with gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist protocol: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yujing Xiong; Zhiqin Bu; Wei Dai; Meixiang Zhang; Xiao Bao; Yingpu Sun
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 5.211

Review 9.  Biological versus chronological ovarian age: implications for assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Carlo Alviggi; Peter Humaidan; Colin M Howles; Donald Tredway; Stephen G Hillier
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 5.211

10.  Recombinant human luteinizing hormone co-treatment in ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technology in women of advanced reproductive age: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Alessandro Conforti; Sandro C Esteves; Peter Humaidan; Salvatore Longobardi; Thomas D'Hooghe; Raoul Orvieto; Alberto Vaiarelli; Danilo Cimadomo; Laura Rienzi; Filippo Maria Ubaldi; Fulvio Zullo; Carlo Alviggi
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 5.211

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.