Literature DB >> 15705267

New technology and partner notification--why aren't we using them?

J E Tomnay1, M K Pitts, C K Fairley.   

Abstract

Partner notification is crucial to the effective control of sexually transmissible infections (STIs) and has not changed substantially over recent years. New technology for communication has been rapidly adopted in our communities but little work has been carried out about its role in contact tracing. Text messaging, emails and the Internet could be useful tools for both provider and patient referral but considerable ethical considerations are involved. Technology is available to help protect the basic tenets of confidentiality and privacy but more thorough exploration of these methods is required to establish efficacy and appropriateness in contact tracing. This research is important if we are to procure an evidence base for future contact tracing strategies rather than allowing these methods to become commonplace at the initiation of our clients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15705267     DOI: 10.1258/0956462052932700

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J STD AIDS        ISSN: 0956-4624            Impact factor:   1.359


  8 in total

1. 

Authors:  Walter H Curioso; Magaly M Blas; Ann E Kurth; Jeffrey D Klausner
Journal:  Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica       Date:  2007-07-27

2.  Patient preferences for partner notification.

Authors:  A Apoola; K W Radcliffe; S Das; V Robshaw; G Gilleran; B S Kumari; M Boothby; R Rajakumar
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.519

Review 3.  Partner notification for sexually transmitted infections in developing countries: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nazmul Alam; Eric Chamot; Sten H Vermund; Kim Streatfield; Sibylle Kristensen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Telling partners about chlamydia: how acceptable are the new technologies?

Authors:  Carol A Hopkins; Meredith J Temple-Smith; Christopher K Fairley; Natasha L Pavlin; Jane E Tomnay; Rhian M Parker; Frank J Bowden; Darren B Russell; Jane S Hocking; Marcus Y Chen
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 3.090

Review 5.  Partner Services in Sexually Transmitted Disease Prevention Programs: A Review.

Authors:  Matthew Hogben; Dayne Collins; Brooke Hoots; Kevin OʼConnor
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.830

6.  Self-reported history of sexually transmissible infections (STIs) and STI-related utilization of the German health care system by men who have sex with men: data from a large convenience sample.

Authors:  Axel J Schmidt; Ulrich Marcus
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 3.090

7.  Access, use and perceptions regarding Internet, cell phones and PDAs as a means for health promotion for people living with HIV in Peru.

Authors:  Walter H Curioso; Ann E Kurth
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 2.796

8.  Risky sexual behaviour amidst predicament of acceptable sexually transmitted infection partner notification modalities: A cross-sectional survey amongst minibus taxi drivers in Gauteng Province, South Africa.

Authors:  Mathildah M Mokgatle; Sphiwe Madiba
Journal:  S Afr Fam Pract (2004)       Date:  2020-12-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.