Literature DB >> 15703959

Could earprint identification be computerised? An illustrated proof of concept paper.

G N Rutty1, A Abbas, D Crossling.   

Abstract

To date, the ear remains an under-utilised part of the human body for use in forensic practice. Although the ear has been used since the nineteenth century as part of the process of human identification, in this particular function its use, to date, remains low and in the case of earprints, controversial. A limited number of publications exist related to methods used for the purpose of ear image identification and the growing field of ear biometrics but to date, a computerised system for earprint identification does not exist. This paper illustrates the concept of a computerised earprint identification system. To assist those considering similar developments we share the concept problems and possible solutions we have identified and encountered to date, and highlight the advantages for such a system over traditional manual methods used for earprint identification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15703959     DOI: 10.1007/s00414-005-0527-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Legal Med        ISSN: 0937-9827            Impact factor:   2.686


  7 in total

Review 1.  Earmarks as evidence: a critical review.

Authors:  I C Champod; I W Evett; B Kuchler
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.832

2.  The human ear: its role in forensic practice.

Authors:  Benjamin Swift; Guy N Rutty
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.832

3.  Forensic web watch.

Authors:  Ali Abbas; Guy N Rutty
Journal:  J Clin Forensic Med       Date:  2003-06

4.  Exploratory study on classification and individualisation of earprints.

Authors:  Lynn Meijerman; Sarah Sholl; Francesca De Conti; Marta Giacon; Cor van der Lugt; Andrea Drusini; Peter Vanezis; George Maat
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2004-02-10       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Anthropometric growth study of the ear.

Authors:  L G Farkas; J C Posnick; T M Hreczko
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  1992-07

6.  Uniqueness of bare feet and its use as a possible means of identification.

Authors:  R B Kennedy
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  1996-09-15       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Identification of human skeletal remains by comparison of bony details of the cranium using computerized tomographic (CT) scans.

Authors:  Deborah R Smith; Keith G Limbird; J Michael Hoffman
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.832

  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  3-D imaging and quantitative comparison of human dentitions and simulated bite marks.

Authors:  S A Blackwell; R V Taylor; I Gordon; C L Ogleby; T Tanijiri; M Yoshino; M R Donald; J G Clement
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Individualization of earprints : Variation in prints of monozygotic twins.

Authors:  Lynn Meijerman; Andrew Thean; Cor van der Lugt; Ruud van Munster; Gert van Antwerpen; George Maat
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.007

3.  Earprints in forensic investigations.

Authors:  Lynn Meijerman; Andrew Thean; George Maat
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.007

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.