Literature DB >> 15703773

A study of the prevalence of significant increases in serum creatinine following angiotension-converting enzyme inhibitor administration.

M L Thorp1, D G Ditmer, M K Nash, R Wise, P L Jaderholm, J D Smith, W Chan.   

Abstract

Angiontension-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) are beneficial in the treatment of diabetic and nondiabetic kidney disease, coronary artery disease and congestive heart failure. One adverse effect of ACEIs use is a rise in serum creatinine and potential renal failure. This paper attempts to quantify this risk and assess the need for pre- and post-ACEI serum creatinine measurements. A computerized search of Kaiser Permanente Northwest's electronic medical record was conducted to find patients over the age of 40 years taking lisinopril between July 1, 2000 and June 30, 2002. Patient demographic information and presence in diabetes and coronary artery disease registries was collected. A subsequent search for pre- and postlisinopril serum creatinine levels within 6 months of initial lisinopril prescription was conducted. Patients with prelisinopril creatinine < or = 1.2 mg/dl and postlisinopril creatinine > 2.5 mg/dl underwent chart review to discern adverse events associated with the rise in serum creatinine. A total of 18,977 patients were prescribed lisinopril between July 1, 2000 and June 30, 2002. In all 13 166 patients had a pre- and postlisinopril creatinine checked. In all, 31 patients had a rise in creatinine from < or = 1.2 mg/dl to > 2.5 mg/dl (0.2%). Possible contributors to rise in creatinine included congestive heart failure, dehydration and infection. No patients developed end-stage renal disease, although three died. In conclusion, end-stage renal disease is an unlikely outcome among patients prescribed lisinopril and is most likely associated with other events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15703773     DOI: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Hypertens        ISSN: 0950-9240            Impact factor:   3.012


  5 in total

1.  The ZDSD rat: a novel model of diabetic nephropathy.

Authors:  Richard G Peterson; Charles Van Jackson; Karen M Zimmerman
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 2.  Identification and management of albuminuria in the primary care setting.

Authors:  Louis Kuritzky; Robert Toto; Peter Van Buren
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.738

3.  Comparison of long-term safety of fixed-dose combinations azilsartan medoxomil/chlorthalidone vs olmesartan medoxomil/hydrochlorothiazide.

Authors:  Joel M Neutel; William C Cushman; Eric Lloyd; Bruce Barger; Alison Handley
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of azilsartan medoxomil with or without chlorthalidone during and after 8 months of treatment for hypertension.

Authors:  Mark S Kipnes; Alison Handley; Eric Lloyd; Bruce Barger; Andrew Roberts
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  Safety and tolerability of azilsartan medoxomil in subjects with essential hypertension: a one-year, phase 3, open-label study.

Authors:  Alison Handley; Eric Lloyd; Andrew Roberts; Bruce Barger
Journal:  Clin Exp Hypertens       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 1.749

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.