Literature DB >> 15703668

Barrett esophagus.

John A Bonino1, Prateek Sharma.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Strides have been made in the past year to identify means of decreasing mortality from esophageal adenocarcinoma. This requires a thorough understanding of the risk factor for its development, Barrett esophagus. This article summarizes the most up-to-date and important advancements involving the epidemiology, screening, pathogenesis, surveillance, and treatment of Barrett esophagus over the past year. RECENT
FINDINGS: Much of the literature over the past year involving Barrett esophagus centered on selecting subsets of patients who would benefit most from screening and surveillance protocols. Risk factors such as increasing age, heartburn symptoms, increasing length of Barrett's segment, and male sex are increasingly identified as increasing the risk for malignant esophageal transformation. New technologies, using smaller endoscopes, may allow more cost-effective screening in selected patient populations. Methylene blue continues to grow in acceptance for its utility in assisting identification of Barrett esophagus during endoscopy. Some concern has been raised recently about DNA damage secondary to the use of methylene blue, but the clinical significance of this is unknown. High-magnification endoscopy to identify certain mucosal patterns suggesting Barrett esophagus is also gaining acceptance, perhaps allowing more accurate surveillance in patients with this condition. Much controversy continues regarding the treatment of Barrett esophagus to prevent the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Data reports may show some advantage of surgical antireflux therapy in reducing the risk of adenocarcinoma, but a recent meta-analysis disputes this claim. Chromosomal abnormalities resulting in tumor suppressor dysfunction continue to be revealed.
SUMMARY: The past year has brought many new advances involving the diagnosis, surveillance, and treatment of Barrett esophagus. It is important for physicians to be aware of these developments, to identify individuals in whom interventions may be undertaken to decrease the risk of the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Entities:  

Year:  2004        PMID: 15703668     DOI: 10.1097/00001574-200407000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0267-1379            Impact factor:   3.287


  3 in total

1.  Computer-assisted analysis of abrasive transepithelial brush biopsies increases the effectiveness of esophageal screening: a multicenter prospective clinical trial by the EndoCDx Collaborative Group.

Authors:  J F Johanson; J Frakes; D Eisen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-12-04       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  DNA hypermethylation regulates the expression of members of the Mu-class glutathione S-transferases and glutathione peroxidases in Barrett's adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  D F Peng; M Razvi; H Chen; K Washington; A Roessner; R Schneider-Stock; W El-Rifai
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Location-specific epigenetic regulation of the metallothionein 3 gene in esophageal adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Dunfa Peng; Tian-Ling Hu; Aixiang Jiang; Mary Kay Washington; Christopher A Moskaluk; Regine Schneider-Stock; Wael El-Rifai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.