Literature DB >> 15703360

Population pharmacokinetic analysis and simulation of the time-concentration profile of etanercept in pediatric patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis.

Dong-Seok Yim1, Honghui Zhou, Mary Buckwalter, Ivan Nestorov, Carl C Peck, Howard Lee.   

Abstract

This study was performed to estimate the population pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of etanercept in pediatric juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA) patients and to compare the steady-state time-concentration profiles between etanercept 0.8-mg/kg once-weekly and 0.4-mg/kg twice-weekly subcutaneous (SC) regimens by clinical trial simulation. To this end, mixed-effect analysis (NONMEM, Version 5.1) was performed using the etanercept PK database consisting of 69 JRA patients (4-17 years). Based on the population PK parameters obtained herein, a Monte Carlo clinical trial simulation experiment was conducted to compare the PK profiles in 200 virtual JRA patients who randomly received either etanercept 0.4 mg/kg SC twice weekly or 0.8 mg/kg once weekly for 12 weeks. The following population PK model could adequately describe etanercept PK profiles for twice-weekly SC dosing of 0.4 mg/kg: CL/F (L/h)=0.0576 (female) or 0.0772 (male) x (body surface area in m2/1.071)1.41, V/F(L)=7.88 x (body weight in kg/30.8). The means +/- standard deviations of simulated trough concentrations for 0.8-mg/kg once-weekly and 0.4-mg/kg twice-weekly dosing regimens were 1.58 +/- 1.07 mg/L and 1.92 +/- 1.09 mg/L, respectively. Peaks during 0.8-mg/kg once-weekly dosing (2.92 +/- 1.41 mg/L) were only 11% higher than during 0.4 mg/kg twice-weekly dosing (2.62 +/- 1.23 mg/L). In conclusion, the clinical trial simulation confirmed that 0.8-mg/kg once-weekly and 0.4-mg/kg twice-weekly SC regimens of etanercept are expected to yield overlapping steady-state time-concentration profiles, leading to equivalent clinical outcomes. This has been the basis of the recent Food and Drug Administration approval of the 0.8-mg/kg once-weekly regimen in pediatric patients with JRA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15703360     DOI: 10.1177/0091270004271945

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0091-2700            Impact factor:   3.126


  23 in total

Review 1.  Evidence of effectiveness: how much can we extrapolate from existing studies?

Authors:  Howard Lee; Dong-Seok Yim; Honghui Zhou; Carl C Peck
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 2.  Update on the medical treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

Authors:  Philip J Hashkes; Ronald M Laxer
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.592

3.  Effectiveness of a once weekly double dose of etanercept in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a clinical study.

Authors:  Femke H M Prince; Marinka Twilt; Nelleke C J A Jansen-Wijngaarden; Lisette W A van Suijlekom-Smit
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2007-02-26       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  Initiating etanercept in a once weekly dose in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

Authors:  Femke H M Prince; Lisette W A van Suijlekom-Smit
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 5.  Computational methods in drug discovery.

Authors:  Gregory Sliwoski; Sandeepkumar Kothiwale; Jens Meiler; Edward W Lowe
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 25.468

6.  Population pharmacokinetics of rhTNFR-Fc in healthy Chinese volunteers and in Chinese patients with Ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  Yi Fang; Lu-jin Li; Rui Wang; Feng Huang; Hai-feng Song; Zhong-ming Tang; Yu-zhen Li; Hua-shi Guan; Qing-shan Zheng
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 6.150

7.  Prospective open-label trial of etanercept as adjunctive therapy for kawasaki disease.

Authors:  Nadine F Choueiter; Aaron K Olson; Danny D Shen; Michael A Portman
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 8.  Facilitation of drug evaluation in children by population methods and modelling.

Authors:  Michel Tod; Vincent Jullien; Gérard Pons
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 9.  Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in the management of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Susan Shenoi; Carol A Wallace
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.022

10.  Challenges in the management of juvenile idiopathic arthritis with etanercept.

Authors:  Clare E Pain; Liza J McCann
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2009-07-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.