Literature DB >> 15702896

Risks associated with the microbiological quality of bodies of fresh and marine water used for recreational purposes: summary estimates based on published epidemiological studies.

Denis Zmirou1, Laurent Pena, Martine Ledrans, Alain Letertre.   

Abstract

The current European standards for microbiological quality of bathing water (i.e., all running or still fresh waters or parts thereof and/or sea water [with the exception of water intended for therapeutic purposes and water used in swimming pools]) were issued in 1976 and are currently undergoing revision. In this article, the authors propose parameters for select microorganism indicators to assist in the establishment of public-health-based objectives for fresh and marine water quality. A type-II meta-analysis of the results of 18 published epidemiological studies was implemented in an attempt to characterize the relationship(s) between concentrations of bacterial indicators and rates of acute gastrointestinal diseases among bathers who had used fresh or marine water for recreational purposes. The authors fit multiple linear-regression models, which allowed for random effects across studies, to derive dose-response curves. Several confounders and effect modifiers were controlled for in the analyses. Risks were then estimated for a hypothetical individual who would bathe 20 times/yr in water that contained a given concentration of microorganisms. For fresh-water-associated highly credible gastrointestinal illnesses, a level of 10 fecal coliforms/100 ml water yielded an attributable risk of 0.2 cases/1,000 person-years; a risk of 2 cases/1,000 person-years was found for fecal streptococci. The corresponding yearly attributable risks were 1 and 13 cases/1,000 person-years, respectively, for 100 bacteria/100 ml fresh water. Risks associated with fecal coliforms were found to be lower in marine water than in fresh water. Irrespective of the type of water examined, total coliforms were related only weakly with acute digestive morbidity. Developers of future bathing-water standards should state the level of risk deemed acceptable for public health. The authors of this study maintain that levels of fecal coliforms and fecal streptococci should be used as criteria for infectious risk management associated with bodies of marine and fresh water used for recreational purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 15702896     DOI: 10.3200/AEOH.58.11.703-711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Environ Health        ISSN: 0003-9896


  9 in total

1.  Distribution of genetic marker concentrations for fecal indicator bacteria in sewage and animal feces.

Authors:  Catherine A Kelty; Manju Varma; Mano Sivaganesan; Richard A Haugland; Orin C Shanks
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  The use of wastewater in livestock production and its socioeconomic and welfare implications.

Authors:  Ehsan Elahi; Muhammad Abid; Liqin Zhang; Gibson Maswayi Alugongo
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Using rapid indicators for Enterococcus to assess the risk of illness after exposure to urban runoff contaminated marine water.

Authors:  John M Colford; Kenneth C Schiff; John F Griffith; Vince Yau; Benjamin F Arnold; Catherine C Wright; Joshua S Gruber; Timothy J Wade; Susan Burns; Jacqueline Hayes; Charles McGee; Mark Gold; Yiping Cao; Rachel T Noble; Richard Haugland; Stephen B Weisberg
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 11.236

4.  Quantitative evaluation of the impact of bather density on levels of human-virulent microsporidian spores in recreational water.

Authors:  Thaddeus K Graczyk; Deirdre Sunderland; Leena Tamang; Timothy M Shields; Frances E Lucy; Patrick N Breysse
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 5.  Should We Put Our Feet in the Water? Use of a Survey to Assess Recreational Exposures to Contaminants in the Anacostia River.

Authors:  Rianna Murray; Sacoby Wilson; Laura Dalemarre; Victoria Chanse; Janet Phoenix; Lori Baranoff
Journal:  Environ Health Insights       Date:  2015-06-21

6.  Is it safe to go back into the water? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the risk of acquiring infections from recreational exposure to seawater.

Authors:  Anne F C Leonard; Andrew Singer; Obioha C Ukoumunne; William H Gaze; Ruth Garside
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 7.  Next-generation sequencing (NGS) for assessment of microbial water quality: current progress, challenges, and future opportunities.

Authors:  BoonFei Tan; Charmaine Ng; Jean Pierre Nshimyimana; Lay Leng Loh; Karina Y-H Gin; Janelle R Thompson
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Estimated Costs of Sporadic Gastrointestinal Illness Associated with Surface Water Recreation: A Combined Analysis of Data from NEEAR and CHEERS Studies.

Authors:  Stephanie DeFlorio-Barker; Timothy J Wade; Rachael M Jones; Lee S Friedman; Coady Wing; Samuel Dorevitch
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Exposure to human-associated fecal indicators and self-reported illness among swimmers at recreational beaches: a cohort study.

Authors:  Melanie D Napier; Richard Haugland; Charles Poole; Alfred P Dufour; Jill R Stewart; David J Weber; Manju Varma; Jennifer S Lavender; Timothy J Wade
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 5.984

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.