BACKGROUND: During ovarian cancer surgery, colorectal resection may be required. In our institution, preoperative colonoscopy is performed in order to assess visceral involvement. AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of preoperative colonoscopy in ovarian cancer patients and the prevalence of adenomas in this population. PATIENTS: This retrospective study involved 144 consecutive patients with a supposed primary ovarian cancer. METHODS: Mucosal infiltration, bowel wall elasticity and bowel fixation were used to predict colorectal infiltration. Endoscopic and pathological findings were compared. All the polyps observed were removed. RESULTS: Six patients (4.2%) were excluded because of a misdiagnosed colorectal cancer metastatic to the ovary. Eight (6%) patients were considered, at endoscopy, to have a bowel infiltration and eight (6%), an uncertain infiltration. In 116 (88%), no signs of bowel infiltration were observed. The pathological analysis showed that colonoscopy had a low sensitivity (44%) in identifying bowel infiltration. Specificity was 100%, positive predictive value 100% and negative predictive value 92%. The overall accuracy was about 90%. Thirty-six adenomas were removed in 26 (20%) women. CONCLUSIONS: Colonoscopy identifies a not insignificant number of ovarian cancer patients requiring colorectal surgery. An increased prevalence of adenomas was not observed in this population.
BACKGROUND: During ovarian cancer surgery, colorectal resection may be required. In our institution, preoperative colonoscopy is performed in order to assess visceral involvement. AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of preoperative colonoscopy in ovarian cancerpatients and the prevalence of adenomas in this population. PATIENTS: This retrospective study involved 144 consecutive patients with a supposed primary ovarian cancer. METHODS: Mucosal infiltration, bowel wall elasticity and bowel fixation were used to predict colorectal infiltration. Endoscopic and pathological findings were compared. All the polyps observed were removed. RESULTS: Six patients (4.2%) were excluded because of a misdiagnosed colorectal cancer metastatic to the ovary. Eight (6%) patients were considered, at endoscopy, to have a bowel infiltration and eight (6%), an uncertain infiltration. In 116 (88%), no signs of bowel infiltration were observed. The pathological analysis showed that colonoscopy had a low sensitivity (44%) in identifying bowel infiltration. Specificity was 100%, positive predictive value 100% and negative predictive value 92%. The overall accuracy was about 90%. Thirty-six adenomas were removed in 26 (20%) women. CONCLUSIONS: Colonoscopy identifies a not insignificant number of ovarian cancerpatients requiring colorectal surgery. An increased prevalence of adenomas was not observed in this population.