Literature DB >> 15702317

[Histological grading of soft tissue sarcomas: stratification of G2-sarcomas in low- or high-grade malignant tumors].

P Meister1.   

Abstract

Histological grading according to one of the proven systems, e.g. that of the FFCCS, leads to the definition of different prognostic risk groups. Prerequisite is a precise typing of the tumors, if necessary by immunohistochemical and molecular-pathological methods. The therapeutic decision is dependent on the presence either of a low- or high-grade malignant tumor: With low-grade sarcomas surgery has priority, with high grade tumors usually chemo- and/or radiotherapy are indicated. With the latter, also better therapeutic response is reported. Therefore, conversion of a 3-grade into a 2-grade system has to be carried out by including the tumor localization as prognostic parameter. Thereby, the large group of G2-sarcomas with intermediate malignancy can be stratified. Superficial G2-sarcomas are considered to be low grade and deep G2-sarcomas high grade malignant. Immunohistochemical staining of tumor cell nuclei with Ki67/MIB1 allows a more standardized and precise grading. The ultimate aim, not to define risk groups, but to predict the prognosis for individual patients, possibly could be reached someday by molecular diagnostic methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15702317     DOI: 10.1007/s00292-005-0748-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathologe        ISSN: 0172-8113            Impact factor:   1.011


  8 in total

Review 1.  [Grading of malignant soft tissue tumors. Historical development and current status].

Authors:  D Kügler; H J Holzhausen
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  Comparative analysis of prognostic indicators for sarcomas of the soft parts and the viscerae.

Authors:  P Rudolph; F Bonichon; K Gloeckner; F Collin; A Chassevent; D Schmidt; J M Coindre; R Parwaresch; G Klöppel
Journal:  Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol       Date:  1998

Review 3.  Histologic grading of adult soft tissue sarcomas.

Authors:  J M Coindre
Journal:  Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol       Date:  1998

Review 4.  Grading of soft tissue sarcomas: proposal for a reproducible, albeit limited scheme.

Authors:  P Meister
Journal:  Curr Top Pathol       Date:  1995

5.  The relevance of the DNA index and proliferation rate in the grading of benign and malignant soft tissue tumors.

Authors:  M C Kroese; D H Rutgers; I S Wils; J A Van Unnik; P J Roholl
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Comparative study of the National Cancer Institute and French Federation of Cancer Centers Sarcoma Group grading systems in a population of 410 adult patients with soft tissue sarcoma.

Authors:  L Guillou; J M Coindre; F Bonichon; B B Nguyen; P Terrier; F Collin; M O Vilain; A M Mandard; V Le Doussal; A Leroux; J Jacquemier; H Duplay; X Sastre-Garau; J Costa
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Grading of soft tissue sarcomas: experience of the EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group.

Authors:  J A van Unnik; J M Coindre; C Contesso; C E Albus-Lutter; T Schiodt; R Sylvester; D Thomas; V Bramwell; H T Mouridsen
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  Does histologic grade in soft tissue sarcoma influence response rate to systemic chemotherapy?

Authors:  C M van Haelst-Pisani; J C Buckner; H M Reiman; D J Schaid; J H Edmonson; R G Hahn
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1991-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.