BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Dose homogeneity is one of the objectives during computer planning of postoperative radiotherapy of the conserved breast. For three-dimensional (3-D) optimization of the dose distribution using serial CT scan images, suitable volumes have to be delineated. The purpose of this study was to develop a computer-generated delineation of a plan optimization volume (POV) and an irradiated volume (IV) and to automate their use in a fast dose homogeneity optimization engine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Simulation was performed according to our standard procedure which involves the positioning of a lead collar around the palpable breast to facilitate the definition of gantry angle, collimator angle and field aperture for tangential wedged photon beams. In a change to the standard procedure an anterolateral radiograph was taken with its axis orthogonal to the central plane of the two tangential half-beams. Images from a serial CT scan were acquired in treatment position, and the geometric data of the three simulated beams were used by a computer program to generate the POV and IV. For each patient, weights of wedged and unwedged beams were optimized by either human heuristics using only the central slice (2-D), the whole set of CT slices (3-D), or by a computer algorithm using the POV, IV and lung volume with constrained matrix inversion (CMI) as optimization method. The resulting dose distributions were compared. RESULTS: The total planning procedure took, on average, 44 min of which < 7 min were needed for human interactions, compared to about 52 min for the standard planning at Ghent University Hospital, Belgium. The simulation time is increased by 2-3 min. The method provides 3-D information of the dose distribution. Dose homogeneity and minimum dose inside the POV and maximum dose inside the IV were not significantly different for the three optimization techniques. CONCLUSION: This automated planning method is capable of replacing the contouring of the clinical target volume as well as the trial-and-error procedure of assigning weights of wedged and unwedged beams by an experienced planner.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Dose homogeneity is one of the objectives during computer planning of postoperative radiotherapy of the conserved breast. For three-dimensional (3-D) optimization of the dose distribution using serial CT scan images, suitable volumes have to be delineated. The purpose of this study was to develop a computer-generated delineation of a plan optimization volume (POV) and an irradiated volume (IV) and to automate their use in a fast dose homogeneity optimization engine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Simulation was performed according to our standard procedure which involves the positioning of a lead collar around the palpable breast to facilitate the definition of gantry angle, collimator angle and field aperture for tangential wedged photon beams. In a change to the standard procedure an anterolateral radiograph was taken with its axis orthogonal to the central plane of the two tangential half-beams. Images from a serial CT scan were acquired in treatment position, and the geometric data of the three simulated beams were used by a computer program to generate the POV and IV. For each patient, weights of wedged and unwedged beams were optimized by either human heuristics using only the central slice (2-D), the whole set of CT slices (3-D), or by a computer algorithm using the POV, IV and lung volume with constrained matrix inversion (CMI) as optimization method. The resulting dose distributions were compared. RESULTS: The total planning procedure took, on average, 44 min of which < 7 min were needed for human interactions, compared to about 52 min for the standard planning at Ghent University Hospital, Belgium. The simulation time is increased by 2-3 min. The method provides 3-D information of the dose distribution. Dose homogeneity and minimum dose inside the POV and maximum dose inside the IV were not significantly different for the three optimization techniques. CONCLUSION: This automated planning method is capable of replacing the contouring of the clinical target volume as well as the trial-and-error procedure of assigning weights of wedged and unwedged beams by an experienced planner.
Authors: C Gaisberger; P Steininger; B Mitterlechner; S Huber; H Weichenberger; F Sedlmayer; H Deutschmann Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2013-06-07 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Thomas Mulliez; Bruno Speleers; Indira Madani; Werner De Gersem; Liv Veldeman; Wilfried De Neve Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2013-06-24 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Hans Paul van der Laan; Wil V Dolsma; John H Maduro; Erik W Korevaar; Johannes A Langendijk Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2008-01-31 Impact factor: 3.481