Literature DB >> 15701373

Influence of macroporous protein scaffolds on bone tissue engineering from bone marrow stem cells.

Hyeon Joo Kim1, Ung-Jin Kim, Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic, Byoung-Hyun Min, David L Kaplan.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of three-dimensional silk fibroin scaffold preparation methods (aqueous and solvent) on osteogenic responses by human bone marrow stem cells (hMSCs). Macroporous 3D protein scaffolds with similar sized pores of 900+/-50 microm were prepared either by an organic solvent process (hexafluoro-2-propanol, HFIP) or an aqueous process. hMSCs were expanded, seeded on the scaffolds, and cultured up to 28 days under static conditions in osteogenic media. hMSCs seeded onto the water-based silk scaffolds showed a significant increase in cell numbers (p<0.01) vs. the HFIP-prepared silk scaffolds. Significantly higher (p<0.01) alkaline phosphatase (ALPase) activity and calcium deposition were apparent after 28 days of culture in the water-based silk scaffolds when compared to the HFIP-derived silk scaffolds. Transcript levels for collagen type I (Col I), ALP, and osteopontin (OP) increased (p<0.05) in the water-based silk scaffolds in comparison to the HFIP-derived materials. At early stages of culture, increased expression of OP and collagen type II (Col II) were also observed in both scaffolds. Expression of Col II, MMP 13, Col I, and OP proteins increased in the water-based silk scaffolds in comparison to the HFIP-derived scaffolds while bone sialoprotein (BSP) proteins increased in the HFIP-derived silk scaffolds in comparison to the water-based scaffolds after 28 days of culture. Histological analysis showed the development of bone-like trabeculae with cuboid cells in an extracellular matrix (ECM) in the water-based silk scaffolds with more organization than in the HFIP-derived material after 28 days of culture. Alcian blue staining demonstrated the presence of proteoglycan in the ECM formed in the water-based scaffolds but not in the HFIP-prepared silk scaffolds. The results suggest that macroporous 3D aqueous-derived silk fibroin scaffolds provide improved bone-related outcomes in comparison to the HFIP-derived systems. These data illustrate the importance of materials processing on biological outcomes, as the same protein, silk fibroin, was used in both preparations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15701373     DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  79 in total

1.  Optimization of macroporous 3-D silk fibroin scaffolds by salt-leaching procedure in organic solvent-free conditions.

Authors:  Xinghua Zhang; Chuanbao Cao; Xilan Ma; Yanan Li
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Tissue response and biodegradation of composite scaffolds prepared from Thai silk fibroin, gelatin and hydroxyapatite.

Authors:  Hathairat Tungtasana; Somruetai Shuangshoti; Shanop Shuangshoti; Sorada Kanokpanont; David L Kaplan; Tanom Bunaprasert; Siriporn Damrongsakkul
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Materials fabrication from Bombyx mori silk fibroin.

Authors:  Danielle N Rockwood; Rucsanda C Preda; Tuna Yücel; Xiaoqin Wang; Michael L Lovett; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 13.491

4.  Annulus fibrosus tissue engineering using lamellar silk scaffolds.

Authors:  Sang-Hyug Park; Eun Seok Gil; Biman B Mandal; Hongsik Cho; Jonathan A Kluge; Byoung-Hyun Min; David L Kaplan
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 3.963

5.  Nanoscale control of silica particle formation via silk-silica fusion proteins for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Aneta J Mieszawska; Lauren D Nadkarni; Carole C Perry; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Chem Mater       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 9.811

6.  Non-invasive characterization of structure and morphology of silk fibroin biomaterials using non-linear microscopy.

Authors:  William L Rice; Shamaraz Firdous; Sharad Gupta; Martin Hunter; Cheryl W P Foo; Yongzhong Wang; Hyeon Joo Kim; David L Kaplan; Irene Georgakoudi
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 7.  Natural origin biodegradable systems in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: present status and some moving trends.

Authors:  J F Mano; G A Silva; H S Azevedo; P B Malafaya; R A Sousa; S S Silva; L F Boesel; J M Oliveira; T C Santos; A P Marques; N M Neves; R L Reis
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2007-12-22       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 8.  Tissue engineered bone grafts: biological requirements, tissue culture and clinical relevance.

Authors:  Mirjam Fröhlich; Warren L Grayson; Leo Q Wan; Darja Marolt; Matej Drobnic; Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic
Journal:  Curr Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.828

9.  Soft tissue augmentation using silk gels: an in vitro and in vivo study.

Authors:  Olivier Etienne; Aurore Schneider; Jonathan A Kluge; Claire Bellemin-Laponnaz; Camille Polidori; Gary G Leisk; David L Kaplan; Jonathan A Garlick; Christophe Egles
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 6.993

10.  Bone tissue engineering with premineralized silk scaffolds.

Authors:  Hyeon Joo Kim; Ung-Jin Kim; Hyun Suk Kim; Chunmei Li; Masahisa Wada; Gary G Leisk; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 4.398

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.