Literature DB >> 15701265

Prostate volume before and after permanent prostate brachytherapy in patients receiving neoadjuvant androgen suppression.

Matthew C Solhjem1, Brian J Davis, Thomas M Pisansky, Torrence M Wilson, Lance A Mynderse, David W Hillman, Michael G Herman, Bernard F King.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Limited duration neoadjuvant cytoreductive hormonal therapy (NHT) is used before the definitive radiotherapeutic management of prostate cancer to decrease target volume size and/or to decrease urinary obstructive symptoms. The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of NHT on prostate volume before permanent prostate brachytherapy (PPB) and on prostatic edema after PPB. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between May 1998 and February 2004, 408 patients underwent PPB at our institution and provided research authorization for the use of their records. Of these, 122 (30%) underwent NHT. Of the 122, 78 (64%) underwent transrectal ultrasound before the start of NHT. Patients undergoing PPB who received NHT were compared with a similar non-NHT group (N = 286). Detailed measurements of prostate volume were performed by transrectal ultrasound before and after NHT, if applicable. In addition, intraoperative preimplantation transrectal ultrasound and post-implantation transrectal ultrasound were also performed. Post-implantation computed tomography was per formed within 1 day of PPB.
RESULTS: The mean duration of NHT was 4.0 +/- 1.1 months (range, 1-8 months). The mean prostate volume before NHT was 63.3 +/- 22.8 cc (range, 19-138 cc), and after NHT (before PPB), it was 41.6 +/- 16.4 cc (18-98 cc). The median prostate volume decrease after NHT was 22.7 cc or 34.9%. There was no significant difference in the degree of postimplantation prostate edema, as measured by the postimplantation to preimplantation ratio (1.18 +/- 0.05 [range, 0.8-1.9]) for the NHT group and 1.21 +/- 0.03 (range, 0.8-1.9) for the non-NHT group (P = 0.5).
CONCLUSIONS: Prostate volume decreased by approximately one third after 4 months of NHT. NHT did not affect the degree of post-PPB prostatic edema.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15701265     DOI: 10.1097/00130404-200411000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer J        ISSN: 1528-9117            Impact factor:   3.360


  5 in total

1.  Interactive-plan technique conquers the disadvantages of volume-reducing hormone therapy in 125I permanent implantation for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hiromichi Ishiyama; Takefumi Satoh; Masashi Kitano; Shouko Kotani; Mineko Uemae; Shiro Baba; Kazushige Hayakawa
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Predictors of prostate volume reduction following neoadjuvant cytoreductive androgen suppression.

Authors:  Krishan R Jethwa; Keith M Furutani; Lance A Mynderse; Torrence M Wilson; Richard Choo; Bernard F King; Eric Bergstralh; Brian J Davis
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2016-11-04

Review 3.  Low dose rate prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Bradley J Stish; Brian J Davis; Lance A Mynderse; Robert H McLaren; Christopher L Deufel; Richard Choo
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-06

4.  Dosimetry advantages of intraoperatively built custom-linked seeds compared with loose seeds in permanent prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Masahiro Inada; Masaki Yokokawa; Takafumi Minami; Kiyoshi Nakamatsu; Yasumasa Nishimura
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2017-10-19

5.  Contemporary Radiation Treatment of Prostate Cancer in Africa: A Ghanaian Experience.

Authors:  Francis A Asamoah; Joel Yarney; Shivanshu Awasthi; Verna Vanderpuye; Puja S Venkat; Angelina K Fink; Arash O Naghavi; Afua Abrahams; James E Mensah; Evans Sasu; Samuel N A Tagoe; Peter A S Johnstone; Kosj Yamoah
Journal:  J Glob Oncol       Date:  2018-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.