Matthew M Murawski1, Tamer Abdelgawad. 1. Department of Pharmacy Practice, Purdue University School of Pharmacy & Pharmacal Sciences, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2051, USA. murawski@pharmacy.purdue.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To conduct an exploratory investigation of the possible effects of the implementation of a state Medicaid preferred drug list (PDL) on the average number of visits by Medicaid patients to hospitals and physicians, and to provide preliminary estimates of the Medicaid reimbursement costs of these additional visits. STUDY DESIGN: A regression-based, difference-in-differences retrospective analysis using anonymized patient-level data on cardiovascular-related inpatient and outpatient hospital visits and procedures, and physician visits and procedures. METHODS: The impact of the implementation of a state Medicaid PDL on a test group of Medicaid cardiovascular patients was examined. A contemporaneous group of non-Medicaid cardiovascular patients from the same state were used as controls. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant increase in the number of outpatient hospital visits and physician visits for the test group compared with the control group in the first 6 months after PDL implementation. There was a positive but statistically insignificant increase in the number of inpatient hospital visits. All increases in visits for the test group compared with the control group in the second 6 months after PDL implementation were positive but statistically insignificant. As a result, estimated average Medicaid reimbursement costs for cardiovascular patients in the state increased during that year. CONCLUSION: The observed range of increases in hospital and physician visits is evidence for the possible existence of an unintended consequence of PDL implementation by state Medicaid programs. Precautionary research in this area is clearly called for.
OBJECTIVE: To conduct an exploratory investigation of the possible effects of the implementation of a state Medicaid preferred drug list (PDL) on the average number of visits by Medicaid patients to hospitals and physicians, and to provide preliminary estimates of the Medicaid reimbursement costs of these additional visits. STUDY DESIGN: A regression-based, difference-in-differences retrospective analysis using anonymized patient-level data on cardiovascular-related inpatient and outpatient hospital visits and procedures, and physician visits and procedures. METHODS: The impact of the implementation of a state Medicaid PDL on a test group of Medicaid cardiovascularpatients was examined. A contemporaneous group of non-Medicaid cardiovascularpatients from the same state were used as controls. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant increase in the number of outpatient hospital visits and physician visits for the test group compared with the control group in the first 6 months after PDL implementation. There was a positive but statistically insignificant increase in the number of inpatient hospital visits. All increases in visits for the test group compared with the control group in the second 6 months after PDL implementation were positive but statistically insignificant. As a result, estimated average Medicaid reimbursement costs for cardiovascularpatients in the state increased during that year. CONCLUSION: The observed range of increases in hospital and physician visits is evidence for the possible existence of an unintended consequence of PDL implementation by state Medicaid programs. Precautionary research in this area is clearly called for.
Authors: Atholl Johnston; Roland Asmar; Björn Dahlöf; Kate Hill; David Albert Jones; Jens Jordan; Michael Livingston; Graham Macgregor; Michael Sobanja; Panagiotis Stafylas; Enrico Agabiti Rosei; José Zamorano Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Anke-Peggy Holtorf; Carrie McAdam-Marx; David Schaaf; Benjamin Eng; Gary Oderda Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2009-02-25 Impact factor: 2.655